首页> 外文学位 >VIRGINITY AND MARYLAND: THE AMERICAN FOUNDING MYTH IN 'THE SOT-WEED FACTORS' OF EBENEZER COOKE AND JOHN BARTH (COLONIAL LITERATURE, ANAGRAMS, POSTMODERN FICTION, NOVEL, POEM).
【24h】

VIRGINITY AND MARYLAND: THE AMERICAN FOUNDING MYTH IN 'THE SOT-WEED FACTORS' OF EBENEZER COOKE AND JOHN BARTH (COLONIAL LITERATURE, ANAGRAMS, POSTMODERN FICTION, NOVEL, POEM).

机译:贞操与马里兰:埃本尼泽·库克和约翰·巴特(殖民文学,analog,后现代小说,小说,小说)的“煤烟因素”中的美国神话。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

John Barth's fiction is centered around rewriting fictions of the past, either "literary" or "historical." Most of Barth's novels deal with a search for origins, an original myth. The present study is based upon one particular case of rewriting in Barth's corpus, namely, the transformation of the Anglo-American poet Ebenezer Cooke's 1708 mock-heroic poem, "The Sot-Weed Factor," into the 1960 novel of the same title. Previous studies which have compared the two works have focused on how Barth's Sot-Weed Factor is a historical novel, or how it is a parody of historical novels. A problem remained to be investigated, however, namely that posed by the Disclaimer, that, "All the characters in this work are fictitious, and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental." The question was to study what Barth meant by "fiction" and "history" in his rewriting of Cooke. Moreover, the Cooke corpus itself is complicated by missing editions, gaps, and seeming accusations of plagiarism and piracy; the "original" "Sot-Weed Factor" may itself be an illegal imitation.;I have attempted to show that Barth has taken the notion of mimesis to its limits as "imitation of the past," through the demystification of History, the use of plagiarism as literary influence, and the technique of fabrication with respect to literary history. This dissertation is a study of Cooke's problematic identity, and the lacunae surrounding both his biography and works, and how those gaps form an important "text" which Barth has filled in. The two Sot-Weed Factors, read as an intertextual pair, thus complement each other and contribute to a rereading of the American founding myth in terms of a scandal covered up by a fiction pretending to imitate another fiction. Using a theoretical approach informed by the anagrams of Saussure and both the deconstructionist approach of Derrida, and an intertextual method taken from modern French theorists, it was possible to show how certain word-themes function as a signifying network between the two works.
机译:约翰·巴特(John Barth)的小说集中于重写过去的小说,无论是“文学”还是“历史”小说。巴特的大多数小说都在寻找起源,这是一个原始的神话。本研究基于巴特语料库重写的一个特殊情况,即将英美诗人埃比尼泽·库克(Ebenezer Cooke)1708年的模拟英雄诗《烂草杂草》转化为1960年同名小说。先前比较这两部作品的研究集中在巴特的《杂草因素》如何成为历史小说,或者它如何成为历史小说的模仿。但是,有一个问题尚待调查,即免责声明所带来的问题:“本作品中的所有人物都是虚构的,与生死真人的任何相似之处纯属偶然。”问题是要研究巴特在重写库克时所指的“小说”和“历史”。此外,库克语料库本身因缺少版本,空白和看似and窃和盗版的指控而变得复杂。 “原始的”“杂草因子”本身可能是非法的模仿。;我试图证明巴特通过对历史的神秘化,对历史的使用和使用,将模仿的概念作为“对过去的模仿”达到了极限。 influence窃作为文学影响力,以及相对于文学历史的捏造技术。本文研究的是库克的问题身份,以及围绕他的传记和作品的空白,以及这些空白如何形成巴特所填补的重要“文本”。这两个杂草因素被理解为互文对,因此相辅相成,并以假装模仿另一种小说的丑闻掩盖丑闻,从而有助于重读美国建国神话。使用索绪尔类似物和德里达的解构主义方法所借鉴的理论方法,以及现代法国理论家采用的互文方法,就可以证明某些单词主题是如何充当这两个作品之间的象征网络。

著录项

  • 作者

    CREWS, JUDITH MARY.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Literature American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 283 p.
  • 总页数 283
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号