• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >ELEMENTS OF THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS IN PRISCIAN'S 'INSTITUTIONES' (LATIN; CONSTANTINOPLE).
【24h】

ELEMENTS OF THEORETICAL LINGUISTICS IN PRISCIAN'S 'INSTITUTIONES' (LATIN; CONSTANTINOPLE).

机译：普里西亚人的“机构”（拉丁语；君士坦丁堡）中的理论语言学要素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Twentieth-century linguistics, judging from a strictly modern point of view, dismisses Priscian's work as unscientific, lacking in method, and irrelevant to the progress of modern linguistics. Yet Priscian's place at the end of the long tradition of classical grammar, building on the work of his many predecessors and functioning as a principal source of information for medieval grammarians, points up his importance for the western grammatical tradition. An examination of Priscian's Institutiones shows that this work made available to Priscian's successors certain fundamental theories on the nature of language as well as doctrines about specific grammatical points.;The presentation of the different levels of language and definitions of the noun and verb represent the most extensive theoretical discussions in Priscian's work. These discussions stress the role of the communication situation in governing language production, analogies between language and the physical universe, and the definitive importance of the semantic component of language. These discussions also suggest the importance of the derivation process.;Discussions of specific subcategories of the parts of speech, such as the paradigm for the reflexive pronoun sui, the formation of interrogatives, and the treatment of other types of "understood" elements in language, help to define the semantic component as a set of what may be called meaning totalities. These meaning totalities must be broken down into their component parts and then matched with linguistic forms in order to generate language. Meaning totalities are partially influenced by the extralinguistic universe and by the communication situation.;Priscian's analyses of the process of derivation are an effort to account partially for the origin of language, or at least of particular language forms, through a theory of derivation in which all paradigms are divided into primary or original forms and secondary or derived forms. Priscian establishes criteria for this division and also suggests other relationships among paradigms.;Priscian views language as a phenomenon produced in the physical universe and in a communication situation, in which meaning totalities are matched with corresponding language forms, most of which, in turn, are generated by a smaller class of primary forms. The theory of derivation and the notion of the relationship between the physical universe, the speakers' perceptions of it, and the structure of language provided important material for medieval grammarians.
机译：从严格的现代观点来看，二十世纪的语言学认为普里希安的工作是不科学的，缺乏方法的，并且与现代语言学的发展无关。然而，普里西安在其许多前辈的工作基础上，在其长期的古典语法传统中处于末端，并作为中世纪语法学家的主要信息来源而发挥了作用，表明了普里西安对西方语法传统的重要性。对Priscian机构的检查表明，这项工作为Priscian的后继者提供了一些有关语言性质以及有关特定语法点的学说的基本理论;;语言的不同层次表示以及名词和动词的定义代表了最多的内容Priscian的作品中进行了广泛的理论讨论。这些讨论强调了交流情况在支配语言生产，语言与物理宇宙之间的类比以及语言语义成分的绝对重要性方面的作用。这些讨论也暗示了推导过程的重要性。讨论语音部分的特定子类别，例如反身代词sui的范式，疑问句的形成以及对语言中其他类型“理解”元素的处理有助于将语义成分定义为一组可以称为含义整体的含义。这些含义的整体必须分解成它们的组成部分，然后与语言形式相匹配才能生成语言。含义的整体部分地受到语言外世界和交际情况的影响。；普里希安对推导过程的分析是一种努力，通过推导理论来部分解释语言或至少特定语言形式的起源。所有范式均分为主要或原始形式，以及次要或派生形式。 Priscian确立了这种划分的标准，并提出了范式之间的其他关系。Priscian认为语言是在物理宇宙和交流环境中产生的一种现象，其中意义的整体与相应的语言形式相匹配，而大多数语言形式反过来又由一小类主要形式生成。派生理论以及物理宇宙，说话者对其的理解以及语言结构之间的关系的概念为中世纪语法学家提供了重要的资料。

著录项

  • 作者

    GAQUIN, AUDREY PATRICIA.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Language Linguistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1983
  • 页码 332 p.
  • 总页数 332
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号