• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >EDA'S PLANNING GRANTS: IMPLEMENTATION ARENAS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
【24h】

EDA'S PLANNING GRANTS: IMPLEMENTATION ARENAS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

机译：EDA的计划授权：实施领域和经济发展。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The study assesses the success of the economic development planning grant program of the Economic Development Administration, applying two sets of standards. First, grantee agencies--which are found at the state, city, and multi-county rural Economic Development District (EDD) level--are examined in light of an idealized planning model developed through a legislative and administrative analysis of the history of federally supported economic development planning. Second, the grantees--and EDA policies toward them--are analyzed through the utilization of a conceptual framework based on the implementation analysis literature.;With such an alternative perspective emphasis shifts from the national agency to the local grantees as the key to the execution of federal policy initiatives. The institutional capacity of the local agency--the planning "infrastructure" in both technical and political senses--is the critical focus of the study. The grantee must be able to represent local interests in the administrative arena and its national sponsor's interests in the local economic development arena.;To encompass both arenas a research design was fashioned that would allow for a sufficiently broad variety of behavior among the grantees selected for study. A comparative case study methodology was used, with an eventual output of consistently structured case studies and a structured data checklist for each of the forty-five sites.;Key findings of the study span several issues. Major findings indicate that state grantees tended to be the poorest class, in that they tend to play extremely circumscribed roles in charting the course of economic development in their states. City grantees, on the other hand, were the strongest class and they have evolved the furthest along the developmental path of institutional capacity building. In both cases, characteristics of organizational structure are isolated as key determinants. The unique nature of the EDDs--they lack any formal jurisdictional powers--limits the nature of their planning and implementation activities, and they have responded by becoming reactive technical-assistance providers to their constituent localities. They have become particularly adept at grantsmanship, securing funding for themselves and the localities.;The framework posits an implementation "macro-structure" composed of two intersecting "bargaining arenas" based on the condition of mutual dependence. The first, which is a common concern of intergovernmental relations and implementation analysis, is a vertical "administrative" arena in which national agencies interact with their local counterparts. The second is a local "economic development" arena in which all of the locality's participants in the economic development process contend and compromise in the devising of local economic development strategies and projects. The horizontal local arena has often been neglected in past studies, resulting in a somewhat distorted view of the implementation process.;On the basis of the findings, recommendations are offered to help guide further EDA planning support. Along with specific programmatic changes, the recommendations use the conceptual structure asserted earlier to demonstrate ways in which EDA can use its limited resources to maximize the response of its grantees. Finally, the use of the macro-structure framework for future studies is considered.
机译：该研究采用两组标准评估了经济发展局的经济发展计划拨款计划的成功。首先，根据在联邦历史上通过立法和行政分析得出的理想化规划模型，对位于州，市和多县农村经济开发区（EDD）级别的受赠机构进行检查。支持经济发展计划。其次，通过使用基于实施分析文献的概念框架来分析受助者及其对EDA的政策;以这种替代的观点，重点从国家机构转移到地方受助者，这是获得援助的关键联邦政策措施的执行。本地机构的机构能力-技术和政治意义上的规划“基础设施”-是研究的重点。受让人必须能够代表行政领域中的地方利益，其国民申办者在地方经济发展领域中的利益。为了涵盖两个领域，制定了一项研究设计，该研究设计将允许被选定的受让人中有足够多种多样的行为研究。使用了比较案例研究方法，最终输出了结构一致的案例研究和针对45个站点中每个站点的结构化数据清单。该研究的主要发现跨越了几个问题。主要发现表明，受助国家往往是最贫穷的阶层，因为他们在规划本州经济发展的过程中往往扮演极其有限的角色。另一方面，城市受助者是最强大的阶层，他们在机构能力建设的发展道路上发展得最远。在这两种情况下，组织结构的特征都是关键决定因素。 EDD的独特性质-它们缺乏任何正式的司法管辖权-限制了其规划和实施活动的性质，并且它们已通过对所在地区成为反应灵敏的技术援助提供者而做出了回应。他们特别擅长于赠款，为自己和地方获得资金。；该框架根据相互依赖的条件，提出了一个由两个相互交叉的“讨价还价场所”组成的“宏观结构”实施方案。第一个是政府间关系和执行分析的共同关注点，是一个纵向的“行政”领域，国家机构在其中与当地政府部门进行互动。第二个是当地的“经济发展”舞台，所有当地经济发展进程的参与者都在制定当地经济发展战略和项目时相互竞争和折衷。在过去的研究中，水平区域的活动常常被忽略，从而导致对实施过程的看法有些失真。；根据调查结果，提出了一些建议，以帮助指导进一步的EDA规划支持。这些建议连同特定的计划更改一起，使用了先前主张的概念结构，以演示EDA可以利用其有限资源来最大化其受赠者的响应的方式。最后，考虑使用宏观结构框架进行未来研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    YULINSKY, CORWIN MARK.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Binghamton.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Binghamton.;
  • 学科 Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1980
  • 页码 282 p.
  • 总页数 282
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 水产、渔业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号