首页> 外文学位 >AN ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER PREFERENCES TOWARD GOVERNMENTAL POLICIES DESIGNED TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN THE PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION SECTOR.
【24h】

AN ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER PREFERENCES TOWARD GOVERNMENTAL POLICIES DESIGNED TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN THE PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION SECTOR.

机译:对旨在减少私人交通部门能源消耗的政府政策的消费者偏好分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Current energy shortages and price increases have brought the energy problem into sharp national focus. The private transportation sector of the U.S. economy accounts for about 14 percent of national energy consumption and about 30 percent of all petroleum used in this country. Reduced consumption in the area of private transportation, therefore, can lead to significant savings of petroleum and can be a major tool in helping to alleviate the energy crisis. In order to explore the preferences, perceptions, and expectations of citizens regarding possible solutions to the nation's energy crisis, it is first necessary to have an instrument that measures consumer attitudes toward the energy problem and a test that gauges consumer knowledge about energy-related issues.;In the second phase of the study, measures of public preferences toward four governmental policies designed to reduce the amount of energy consumed by the private transportation sector were obtained. These policies are (1) a gas-guzzler tax, (2) weekend closing of gasoline stations, (3) increasing gasoline prices, and (4) rationing the supply of gasoline. General demographics, attitudes toward the energy problem, and the apparent knowledge of respondents were used to study consumer preferences toward the alternative gasoline conservation policies. Of interest to public policy makers is that people in lower education and income groups view the oil companies cynically, are less informed about energy-related issues, and do not preceive technology as a vehicle for solving the energy problem. Also, a higher proportion of individuals in the high education and income categories prefer increased prices to supply restriction; the gas-guzzler tax is most supported by younger individuals and whites; and gasoline rationing is viewed to be less onerous than other policy options and is viewed similarly by all population segments except for heavy gasoline users.;Limitations and implications of the present study, as well as recommendations for further research in the area of energy conservation policies, are discussed.;The first phase of the study involves the psychometric development of a scale designed to measure consumer attitudes toward the energy problem. Scale construction includes the following steps: (1) generation of scale items; (2) assessment of dimensionality; (3) selection of items for the final scale; and (4) assessment of reliability and validity of the scale. Factor and item analysis assessed the multidimensionality of the scale. The factors obtained were: cynicism toward the oil companies, material growth, and belief in technology. The final scale of 18 items had an internal consistency of 0.74 as measured by coefficient alpha. The procedure for constructing the energy quiz is also reported.
机译:当前的能源短缺和价格上涨使能源问题成为了全国性的焦点。美国经济的私人运输部门约占该国能源消耗的14%,占该国使用的所有石油的30%。因此,减少私人运输领域的消费可以节省大量石油,并且可以成为缓解能源危机的主要工具。为了探索公民对国家能源危机可能解决方案的偏好,看法和期望,首先需要有一种工具来衡量消费者对能源问题的态度,并进行测试以衡量消费者对能源相关问题的了解在研究的第二阶段,获得了针对四项旨在减少私人运输部门消耗的能源量的政府政策的公共优惠措施。这些政策是(1)耗油量高的税收;(2)加油站周末关闭;(3)汽油价格上涨;以及(4)配给汽油。总体人口统计,对能源问题的态度以及受访者的明显知识被用来研究消费者对替代汽油养护政策的偏好。公共政策制定者感兴趣的是,处于较低教育程度和收入阶层的人们对石油公司持愤世嫉俗的态度,对能源相关问题的了解较少,并且不认为技术是解决能源问题的手段。同样,较高比例的高等教育和收入人群更喜欢价格上涨而不是供应限制。耗油税最受年轻人和白人的支持;汽油配给被认为没有其他政策选择那么繁重,除重汽油使用者外,所有人群都认为汽油配给是相似的;本研究的局限性和意义,以及在节能政策领域的进一步研究建议研究的第一阶段涉及量表的心理计量学发展,该量表旨在测量消费者对能源问题的态度。规模建设包括以下步骤:(1)规模项目的产生; (2)尺寸的评估; (3)选择最终规模的项目; (4)评估量表的信度和效度。因子和项目分析评估了量表的多维性。获得的因素包括:对石油公司的冷嘲热讽,物质增长和对技术的信念。 18个项目的最终量表的内部一致性为0.74(通过系数α测得)。还报告了构建能量测验的过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    TASHCHIAN, ARMEN.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 Business Administration General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1980
  • 页码 218 p.
  • 总页数 218
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号