首页> 外文学位 >Toward a Global Human Rights Regime for Temporary Migrant Workers: Lessons from the Case of Filipino Workers in the United Arab Emirates.
【24h】

Toward a Global Human Rights Regime for Temporary Migrant Workers: Lessons from the Case of Filipino Workers in the United Arab Emirates.

机译:建立全球临时工人权制度:阿拉伯联合酋长国菲律宾工人案例的教训。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Temporary contract migrants as a class fall between systems of responsibility: home country, host country, and international community. The systems are separately inadequate and basically uncoordinated, leaving migrants in a precarious situation. The situation of temporary contract migrants is even more precarious as they cross international borders without a path to citizenship or full enfranchisement in the political, economic, and social life of the host country. Where citizenship and residence/employment are divided between multiple countries, the corresponding human rights obligations are similarly divided. This division results in migrant rights falling between different state-based systems of responsibility. Human rights can be divided between those that are inherent in citizenship (citizenship obligation) which are the responsibility of the sending state, those that are inherent in the physical body (presence obligation) which are the responsibility of the receiving state, and those that fall between systems of responsibility (involvement obligation) which require sending and receiving countries to act cooperatively. These categories provide clear guidance in sorting out responsibilities for the rights of temporary contract migrants and direct us towards possible avenues for reform. Once adopted, this framework can help guide bilateral or regional agreements on a case-by-case basis. Although the principles underlying split responsibility are universal, the required elements of cooperation are likely to vary between different contexts. This dissertation draws on analyses and interviews conducted with Filipino temporary contract migrants in the United Arab Emirates in order to substantiate the argument, illustrating strategies that migrants as agents utilize to improve their conditions, the tradeoffs that they have made in order to secure their livelihood in a global job market, and the impact that current policy frameworks have on their lived experience.
机译:临时合同移民属于一类责任制:母国,东道国和国际社会。这些系统分别不足和基本不协调,使移民处于不稳定的境地。临时合同移民的境况更加不稳定,因为他们越过国际边界而没有获得国籍的资格,也没有在东道国的政治,经济和社会生活中充分享有公民权。在多个国家之间划分公民身份和居住/就业的情况下,相应的人权义务也有类似的划分。这种划分导致移民权利落在基于国家的不同责任制之间。人权可以分为公民固有的(公民义务)(即派遣国的责任),身体固有的固有属性(在场义务)(即接受国的责任)和责任制(参与义务)之间的差异,要求派遣国和接受国共同采取行动。这些类别为理清临时合同移民权利的责任提供了明确的指导,并将我们引向可能的改革途径。一旦采用,该框架将有助于根据具体情况指导双边或区域协定。尽管分担责任的基本原则是普遍的,但合作的必要要素可能会因不同情况而异。本文以对阿拉伯联合酋长国的菲律宾临时合同移民的分析和访谈为依据,以证实这一论点,阐述了移民作为代理人利用其改善条件的策略,以及为确保其生计而进行的权衡。全球就业市场,以及当前政策框架对其生活经验的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nockerts, Regina A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Denver.;
  • 学科 International relations.;Labor relations.;Middle Eastern studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 412 p.
  • 总页数 412
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号