• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Citizens, residents, and guest workers: A transatlantic analysis of immigrant rights and political cleavages.
【24h】

Citizens, residents, and guest workers: A transatlantic analysis of immigrant rights and political cleavages.

机译：公民，居民和外来务工人员：跨大西洋分析移民权利和政治分裂。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The fundamental argument of this dissertation is that migrant rights are central to understanding the politics of immigration: by defining what migrants can or cannot do in the receiving state, the bundle of rights granted to migrants conditions the effect that migrants have on domestic groups' interests and therefore which societal groups will favor or oppose immigration liberalization. Increasing migrant rights increases the market, fiscal, and cultural costs of immigration to the right, but decreases the market costs and generates political and cultural benefits to the left. As a result, migrant rights condition preferences over immigration---such that the right (left) should favor (oppose) the admission of migrants with few rights and oppose (favor) the admission of migrants with expansive rights -- and immigration policy outcomes---such that immigration reform will focus on increasing the admission of migrants with a limited (broad) set of rights when the right (left) is in government. These policy outcomes will vary in predictable ways under divided government and when policymakers are constrained with respect to the provision of migrant rights.;In the first three chapters, I present the puzzle that motivates my project, my critique of the extant literature, my conceptualization of migrant rights as defining societal membership, and the theoretical framework that links migrant rights, societal interests, and immigration policy outcomes. In the following four chapters, I test the expectations of the theoretical chapter in the United States and across the European Union. The first two empirical chapters consider the policy preferences of political actors and immigration policy outcomes in the United States. The second two empirical chapters do so across the European Union. In the concluding chapter, I situate the results of the empirical analysis in the contemporary context, highlight some of the implications for scholarship in both political economy and immigration politics, and consider the compatibility of extending and withholding rights in a liberal democratic society.
机译：本文的基本论点是，移民权利是理解移民政治的核心：通过定义移民在接收国可以做什么或不能做什么，授予移民的权利捆绑决定了移民对国内群体利益的影响因此，哪些社会团体会赞成或反对移民自由化。移民权利的增加会增加右侧移民的市场，财政和文化成本，但会降低市场成本并为左侧产生政治和文化利益。结果，移民权利条件优先于移民-权利（左）应赞成（反对）接纳几乎没有权利的移民，而反对（赞成）接纳具有扩张权利的移民-以及移民政策的结果---这样的移民改革将着重于在权利（左）在政府中时增加对权利（有限）的移民的接纳。在分裂的政府和政策制定者在提供移民权利方面受到限制时，这些政策结果将以可预测的方式发生变化。在前三章中，我提出了困扰我的项目，对现有文献的批评，对概念化的迷惑移民权利定义了社会成员资格，以及将移民权利，社会利益和移民政策成果联系起来的理论框架。在接下来的四章中，我测试了美国和整个欧盟对这一理论章的期望。前两个实证章节考虑了美国政治角色的政策偏好和移民政策的结果。后两个实证章节在整个欧盟范围内进行。在最后一章中，我介绍了当代背景下的实证分析结果，突出了政治经济学和移民政治对学术的一些启示，并考虑了自由民主社会中权利的扩展和扣留的兼容性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cormack Patton, Sarah J.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 224 p.
  • 总页数 224
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号