首页> 外文学位 >When Hurt Heroes Do Harm: Collective Guilt and Leniency toward War-Veteran Transgressors.
【24h】

When Hurt Heroes Do Harm: Collective Guilt and Leniency toward War-Veteran Transgressors.

机译:伤害英雄何时危害:对战争老兵的集体内Collect和宽大。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Protectors who do harm are often punished more severely because their crime is perceived as a betrayal of trust. Two experiments test whether this will generalize to protectors who incur harm while serving in their protective role, and if not, whether collective guilt for the harm they suffered provides an explanation. Study 1 tested competing hypotheses that a veteran (versus civilian) with PTSD would be punished either more harshly because of the trust betrayal, or more leniently because of increased guilt about the harm the veteran suffered during war. Men and women were both more lenient toward a veteran (versus civilian) but this effect was mediated by collective guilt only among men. In Study 2, guilt inductions increased leniency among participants less likely to classify the veteran as an in-group member (women, low national identifiers), but not in those who are more likely to classify the veteran as an in-group member (men, high national identifiers), who were lenient without any guilt inductions.
机译:造成伤害的保护者通常会受到更严厉的惩罚,因为他们的犯罪被视为背叛了信任。两项实验测试了这一点是否可以归结为在发挥保护作用的过程中遭受损害的保护者,如果没有,是否集体为他们所遭受的损害而负罪感可以提供一个解释。研究1检验了相互竞争的假设,即对PTSD的退伍军人(相对于平民)将因信任背叛而受到更严厉的处罚,或者由于对退伍军人在战争中所遭受的伤害的加重内而受到更宽大的惩罚。男性和女性对退伍军人(平民)的态度都比较宽容,但这种影响只能由男性的集体罪恶感来介导。在研究2中,内participants感增加了参与者的宽大处理,他们不太可能将退伍军人归类为组内成员(妇女,较低的国家识别码),而对于那些更有可能将退伍军人归类为组内成员的参与者(男性,高国家识别号),他们宽容而没有任何内感。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jay, Alexander Charles.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 Psychology.;Law.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 67 p.
  • 总页数 67
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号