• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Policy Choices of the Post-Soviet States Regarding Foreign Direct Investment in the Key Sectors of their Economies: the Experience of Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine.
【24h】

Policy Choices of the Post-Soviet States Regarding Foreign Direct Investment in the Key Sectors of their Economies: the Experience of Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine.

机译：后苏联国家关于在其经济主要领域的外国直接投资的政策选择：哈萨克斯坦，俄罗斯和乌克兰的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Why did some post-Soviet states open up their key economic sectors to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) while others did not? This dissertation argues that the levels of FDI were a result of conscious policy choices rather than ability or inability of the post-Soviet states to create positive investment climate. It explains why Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine made different policy choices regarding FDI into their oil and gas, and metallurgy and mining sectors despite similar sectoral composition of their economies and common past as part of the Soviet Union. I argue that these policy choices were political. The state officials made their policy choices under the influence of two main factors.;The first factor was whether or not they believed they could develop a sector exclusively through the use of national resources, with the help of domestic state and private actors. The state of the sector's development during the Soviet era heavily influenced this perception. After the collapse of the USSR, all sectors across all republics needed capital and technologies to maintain production, yet needed them to a different extent. The second factor influencing FDI policy choices was the strategy of power maintenance that political regimes chose and, more specifically, the different political roles they ascribed to different sectors. Sectors with their assets became highly material forms of power that were used by the regimes toward attainment of these three goals.
机译：为什么某些后苏联国家向外国直接投资（FDI）开放其主要经济部门，而另一些国家却不开放？本文认为，外国直接投资的水平是有意识的政策选择的结果，而不是后苏联国家创造积极投资环境的能力或无能的结果。这就解释了为什么哈萨克斯坦，俄罗斯和乌克兰在经济，行业和欧洲共同构成过去的时期具有相似的部门构成，并且在石油，天然气，冶金和采矿业方面对外国直接投资做出不同的政策选择。我认为这些政策选择是政治性的。国家官员在两个主要因素的影响下做出政策选择：第一个因素是他们是否相信自己可以在国内国家和私人行为者的帮助下完全通过利用国家资源来发展该部门。苏联时期该行业的发展状况极大地影响了这种看法。苏联解体后，所有共和国的所有部门都需要资金和技术来维持生产，但在不同程度上需要它们。影响外国直接投资政策选择的第二个因素是政治体制选择的权力维持策略，更具体地说，是它们赋予不同部门的不同政治角色。拥有资产的部门成为政权用来实现这三个目标的高度物质权力形式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kesarchuk, Olga.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 343 p.
  • 总页数 343
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号