• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Identifying Factors that Predict Policy Practice Among Social Workers
【24h】

Identifying Factors that Predict Policy Practice Among Social Workers

机译：确定预测社会工作者政策实践的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The social work profession has long touted a dual focus on service within micro and macro realms of practice, preparing social workers to serve marginalized populations at the boundary between the powerful and the powerless. Research, however, has shown that macro social work, or policy practice, has diminished. Current research has been inconsistent in identifying predictive factors of increased policy practice. With recent efforts by the profession to bolster waning policy practice among social workers, it is vital to identify factors that predict higher engagement. Theoretical frameworks suggest that professional socialization in policy practice as a group norm, having resources to participate in policy practice, being psychologically engaged in politics, and engaging in recruitment networks tends to increase policy practice. Based on these frameworks, professional socialization, policy practice preparedness, type of employment, and social media use were considered as potential predictive factors of engagement. The purpose of this study was to analyze these factors that may predict policy practice among social workers. Survey research was used to gather data from practicing social workers in Illinois (N = 93). A hierarchical multiple regression analysis empirically validated that higher levels of perceived professional socialization and policy practice preparedness both predicted higher levels of policy practice. Additionally, social workers who reported primary roles as administrative were more likely to engage in policy practice than direct practitioners. The results point to a need for the social work profession to bolster knowledge and skills in policy practice, reinforce professional identification in policy practice, and mobilize leaders to recruit and mentor direct practitioners.
机译：社会工作专业长期以来一直吹嘘在微观和宏观实践领域内对服务的双重关注，使社会工作者为服务于处于强势与无能为力之间的边缘化人群提供服务。然而，研究表明，宏观社会工作或政策实践已经减少。当前的研究在确定增加政策实践的预测因素方面一直不一致。随着该行业最近为加强社会工作者中逐渐减弱的政策实践所做的努力，至关重要的是要确定预测更高参与度的因素。理论框架表明，政策实践中的专业社会化是一个整体规范，拥有参与政策实践的资源，心理上参与政治活动以及参与招聘网络的趋势，这往往会增加政策实践。基于这些框架，专业社会化，政策实践准备，就业类型和社交媒体使用被认为是参与的潜在预测因素。这项研究的目的是分析这些因素，这些因素可以预测社会工作者的政策实践。调查研究用于从伊利诺伊州的社会工作者中收集数据（N = 93）。分层多元回归分析从经验上验证了更高水平的专业社交能力和政策实践准备水平都预示着更高水平的政策实践。另外，报告称主要角色为行政管理人员的社会工作者比直接执业者更可能从事政策实践。结果表明，社会工作专业需要加强政策实践方面的知识和技能，加强政策实践中的专业鉴定，并动员领导者招募和指导直接从业者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Broers, Dawn R.;

  • 作者单位

    Walden University.;

  • 授予单位 Walden University.;
  • 学科 Social work.;Public policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 166 p.
  • 总页数 166
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号