首页> 外文学位 >Issue voting with hearts and minds: Explaining heterogeneity in directional and proximity voting.
【24h】

Issue voting with hearts and minds: Explaining heterogeneity in directional and proximity voting.

机译:认真地进行投票:解释定向投票和邻近投票中的异质性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Is issue voting a uniform, unchangeable process across individuals and contexts, or is it dynamic and manipulable? Even though scholars have been interested in issue voting since the seminal studies in political behavior, there is still ongoing disagreement about what exactly voters prefer in a candidate's issue position. I argue that one reason for this lack of consensus is that the issue voting process is not constant across individuals and contexts. My research addresses one of the most prominent unresolved disputes in the behavior literature by seeking to explain heterogeneity in issue voting processes---why do some voters make decisions based on issue proximity, while others decide based on issue directions? I theorize that proximity voting is a product of technical thinking, while directional voting is a product of emotional thinking. I find that individuals can display either behavior, or even be induced to do so, depending on the strength and salience of each type of consideration at the time of the decision.
机译:问题投票是跨个人和上下文的统一,不变的过程,还是动态且可操纵的?尽管自从对政治行为进行开创性研究以来,学者一直对问题投票产生兴趣,但对于选民在候选人的问题立场中究竟偏爱什么,仍然存在分歧。我认为,缺乏共识的一个原因是,问题投票过程在个人和背景之间并不恒定。我的研究通过寻求解释问题投票过程中的异质性来解决行为文献中最突出的未解决争端之一-为什么有些选民根据问题接近性做出决定而另一些选民则根据问题方向做出决定?我认为接近投票是技术思维的产物,而定向投票是情感思维的产物。我发现个人可以显示任何一种行为,甚至可以诱使他们这样做,这取决于决策时每种考虑因素的强度和显着性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thaler, Daniel J.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Social psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 148 p.
  • 总页数 148
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号