首页> 外文学位 >A Comparative Analysis of Required Continuing Education in Florida SB1108 and Teacher Self-efficacy for Inclusion
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Required Continuing Education in Florida SB1108 and Teacher Self-efficacy for Inclusion

机译:佛罗里达州SB1108所需继续教育与教师包容性自我效能的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While classroom teachers report alarming rates of unpreparedness, and even unwillingness to include diverse populations in the classroom, our nation is continuing along a trend started in the 1990s to include students with disabilities (SWD) in general education settings. This quasi-experimental research study uncovered the impact of completing the required continuing education course in teaching SWD course mandated by Florida Senate Bill 1108 ([SB1108]; The Florida Senate, 2013b), which amended Florida Statute 1012.585 (3) (e) (Process for Renewal of Professional Certificates, 2017) on perceived teacher ability to implement inclusion practices. An online version of the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practices (TEIP) scale developed by Sharma, Loreman, and Forlin (2012) was utilized, along with demographic and experiential factors for classroom teachers in the study district to examine their self-efficacy toward inclusion. Analysis of the data indicated statistically significant differences in mean TEIP scale scores for exceptional student education (ESE) and general education teachers.;Data analyses revealed that almost half of the teachers had a negative view of and did not perceive any benefit from the course. While ESE and general education teachers had similar preparation needs, they also reported areas of concern specific to their subset. Overall, the course did not provide enough continuing education in the areas most needed by the participants. SB1108-mandated course completion was also not found to be an indicator of higher teacher self-efficacy for the majority of teachers. Analysis of the differences in TEIP scale scores found that only elementary school teachers benefited from completing the course, while it had the opposite effect for general education high school teachers and no significant effect for ESE teachers. Differences in TEIP scale scores from demographic and experiential factors accounted for 13% of the variance in the population and was not significant for the ESE teacher subset. One percent or less of the variance was attributed to completion of the required continuing education course.;Implications include reviewing the legislation's effectiveness for teachers in different areas and grade levels, hiring and evaluation decisions based on TEIP scale scores of applicants and employees, and designing more meaningful continuing education courses. Recommendations for state legislatures, school administrators, designers of continuing education courses, and for future research regarding improvement of teacher self-efficacy for inclusive practices are offered.
机译:虽然课堂教师报告说,他们的准备不足甚至不愿将多样化的人群纳入课堂的比率令人震惊,但我们的国家仍沿1990年代开始的趋势发展,将残疾学生(SWD)纳入普通教育环境。这项准实验性研究研究揭示了完成所需的继续教育课程对佛罗里达州参议院1108号法案([SB1108];佛罗里达州参议院,2013b)授权的社署课程的影响,该法案修订了佛罗里达州法规1012.585(3)(e)(关于认可教师实施包容性实践能力的《专业证书更新流程》(2017年)。利用Sharma,Loreman和Forlin(2012)开发的在线版本的“包容性实践的教师效能”量表(TEIP),以及研究地区的课堂教师的人口统计学和经验因素,研究了他们对融入社会的自我效能。数据分析表明,特殊学生教育(ESE)和通识教育教师的TEIP平均得分的统计差异显着。数据分析显示,几乎一半的教师对该课程持负面看法,也没有从中受益。尽管ESE和通识教育教师具有类似的准备需求,但他们也报告了其子集特定的关注领域。总体而言,该课程未能在参与者最需要的领域提供足够的继续教育。还没有发现SB1108要求的课程结业标志着大多数教师的自我效能较高。对TEIP量表分数的差异进行分析后发现,只有小学教师会从完成课程中受益,而对普通教育高中教师则有相反的影响,而对ESE教师则没有显着影响。 TEIP量表分数与人口统计学和经验因素的差异占总体差异的13%,对于ESE教师子集而言,差异并不显着。差异的百分之一或更少归因于完成了所需的继续教育课程。;含义包括审查立法对不同领域和年级的教师的有效性,基于申请人和雇员的TEIP等级分数的聘用和评估决定以及设计更有意义的继续教育课程。为州立法机关,学校行政人员,继续教育课程的设计者以及有关提高教师对包容性实践的自我效能感的未来研究提供建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scruggs, Leigh A.;

  • 作者单位

    Florida Atlantic University.;

  • 授予单位 Florida Atlantic University.;
  • 学科 Education policy.;Continuing education.;Special education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号