• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Choices, Narratives, and Dilemmas of Sacred Rhetoric: A Strategic Interactionist Perspective of the Unity for Gallaudet Protests in 2006.
【24h】

The Choices, Narratives, and Dilemmas of Sacred Rhetoric: A Strategic Interactionist Perspective of the Unity for Gallaudet Protests in 2006.

机译：神圣修辞学的选择，叙事和困境：2006年加拉罗德抗议统一的战略互动主义视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

At the heart of this dissertation is the analytical goal to develop more contextual understandings of sacred rhetoric - an absolutist form of reasoning that appeals to principled, non-negotiable, and moral values, and invites moral outrage---by examining the Unity for Gallaudet (UFG) protests in 2006. Attracting national and international attention, the UFG protests at the only liberal arts university in the world for deaf people have been widely criticized in the news media and scholarly analyses as "cultural politics gone wild." Protestors are still described as "Big D" activists who made non-negotiable demands that the president-select resign because she was "not Deaf enough." With process tracing and frame and narrative analyses of public and private documents, however, I describe how sacred rhetoric of the protests was shaped by unexpected choices made by university administrators, protestors, political elites, and the news media, and packaged with ideological narratives about justice and representation that divide progressives and conservatives in the culture wars. By exploring the UFG protests from a strategic interactionist perspective, this case study fleshes out political complexities of an absolutist way of talking about identity politics and social justice that is becoming more popular in this day and age, and draws upon Jasper (2006), Marietta (2012), and Haidt (2012) in making the case that sacred rhetoric is not so much a political advantage for cultural ideologues as a strategic dilemma for decent people involving adaptation, simplification, and polarization.
机译：本论文的核心是分析目标，旨在发展对神圣修辞学的更多语境理解-这是一种绝对主义的推理形式，诉诸于有原则的，不可商议的和道德的价值观，并引起道德上的愤慨-通过检查Unity for Gallaudet （UFG）抗议活动于2006年举行。在全球唯一的聋哑人文科大学中，UFG抗议活动引起了国内外的关注，在新闻媒体和学术分析中被广泛批评为“文化政治疯狂”。抗议者仍然被描述为“ Big D”活动家，他们提出了一些不可商议的要求，即总统选择辞职是因为她“聋哑”。但是，通过对公共和私人文档进行过程跟踪以及框架和叙事分析，我描述了抗议的神圣修辞是如何被大学管理者，抗议者，政治精英和新闻媒体做出的意外选择所塑造的，并带有关于在文化战争中，正义与代表将进步派和保守派分开。通过从战略互动主义者的角度探讨UFG抗议活动，本案例研究阐明了在当今时代越来越流行的以绝对主义方式谈论身份政治和社会正义的政治复杂性，并借鉴了Jasper（2006），Marietta （2012）和Haidt（2012）认为，神圣的修辞并不仅仅是文化思想家的政治优势，而是体面人的战略困境，包括适应，简化和两极分化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stern, Brendan.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Rhetoric.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 186 p.
  • 总页数 186
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号