• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >What's the deal? Standardizing contracts for public-private partnerships.
【24h】

What's the deal? Standardizing contracts for public-private partnerships.

机译：这是怎么回事？规范公私合营合同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Over the past decades, governments have increasingly welcomed private financiers and investors to take care of the provision of public infrastructure. As a result, the popularity of public-private partnerships (PPPs) has grown. A public-private partnership is an approach to the construction and maintenance of infrastructure in which the private sector finances a project, takes on an expanded role for facility design, construction, operations and/or maintenance, and bears a considerable amount of risk.;Public-private partnerships are packed with management challenges. Many difficulties turn up during the contracting process, which typically involves onerous negotiations. In order to remedy these challenges, governments are showing increasing interest in facilitating the contracting process. The creation and use of standard contracts is one of the measures that governments have recently been taking. This thesis improves our understanding of this specific measure. It focuses on public infrastructure projects in Flanders, Belgium.;The research provides insights into the struggle of governments with the governance and complexity of PPP. Furthermore, this thesis provides evidence to suggest that the use of standard contracts is no guarantee for swifter contractual negotiations. Policy and politics are important factors in the world of standardization, and it is shown that there is more to using a standard contract than applying it to any type of asset in different contexts. Finally, the study unveils the learning process of governments as they gradually move toward a standard contract for road infrastructure projects. Rather than using model contracts as a means to ensure that public sector interests are served, the government continuously tested whether contractual clauses were in line with market practice.;This thesis does not intend to determine which aspects are most promising or important in regard to successfully creating and using standard contracts. Instead, it provides different perspectives on standardization and shows that it is not nearly a straightforward or objective practice. As such, this study indicates the need to apply a more critical perspective and not just take for granted the propagated perks of standardization.
机译：在过去的几十年中，各国政府越来越欢迎私人金融家和投资者注意提供公共基础设施。结果，公私合作伙伴关系（PPP）的普及度增加了。公私伙伴关系是基础设施建设和维护的一种方法，其中私营部门为项目提供资金，扩大设施设计，建设，运营和/或维护的作用，并承担相当大的风险。公私伙伴关系充满了管理挑战。在签约过程中会出现许多困难，通常涉及繁重的谈判。为了解决这些挑战，政府对促进合同签订过程表现出越来越大的兴趣。标准合同的创建和使用是政府最近采取的措施之一。本论文提高了我们对这一具体措施的理解。它着重于比利时法兰德斯的公共基础设施项目。该研究提供了有关政府在PPP治理和复杂性方面的斗争的见解。此外，本文提供了证据表明标准合同的使用不能保证迅速进行合同谈判。政策和政治是标准化世界中的重要因素，并且表明使用标准合同比将其应用于不同背景下的任何类型的资产还有更多的事情。最后，该研究揭示了政府逐步向道路基础设施项目的标准合同迈进的学习过程。政府没有使用合同范本作为确保公共部门利益的手段，而是不断测试合同条款是否与市场惯例相符。本文不打算确定成功方面最有希望或最重要的方面创建和使用标准合同。取而代之的是，它对标准化提供了不同的观点，并表明这几乎不是一种直接或客观的实践。因此，这项研究表明有必要运用更为批判的观点，而不仅仅是将标准化所带来的好处。

著录项

  • 作者

    van den Hurk, Martijn.;

  • 作者单位

    Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium).;

  • 授予单位 Universiteit Antwerpen (Belgium).;
  • 学科 Public administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 208 p.
  • 总页数 208
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号