首页> 外文学位 >Web Accessibility of the Higher Education Institute Websites Based on the World Wide Web Consortium and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act.
【24h】

Web Accessibility of the Higher Education Institute Websites Based on the World Wide Web Consortium and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act.

机译:基于万维网联盟和《康复法案》第508条的高等教育学院网站的Web可访问性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The problem observed in this study is the low level of compliance of higher education website accessibility with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The literature supports the non-compliance of websites with the federal policy in general. Studies were performed to analyze the accessibility of fifty-four sample web pages using automated testing via auto-validation tools and using manual testing via assistive technology, followed by a comparative analysis of the findings of the auto validation tools. The auto-validation tools utilized on the sample web pages were comprised of three W3C validation tools. The results showed that two-thirds of the websites failed Priority 1 validation, while one hundred percent of the websites failed to meet the Priority 2 and Priority 3 validation. In addition, three web pages were tested against Section 508 guidelines. The result of the manual testing by assistive technology confirmed that all three websites failed to meet the minimum requirement of federal policy. Moreover, a comparative analysis between the validations of the W3C tools showed that significant differences existed between the findings of each auto-validation tool.;The findings of this study implied that passing the evaluations of auto validation tools is not enough to ensure accessible websites to individuals with disabilities. It is important to utilize assistive tools to determine web accessibility as it appears to individuals with disabilities. Recommendations were made for improvements such as encouraging universities to provide training for website managers and implementing the mandatory use of screen-readers as a validation tool.
机译:本研究中观察到的问题是,高等教育网站可访问性与1973年《康复法案》第508条的依从性较低。文献支持网站不符合联邦政策。进行了研究以分析54个示例网页的可访问性,其中包括通过自动验证工具进行的自动测试和通过辅助技术进行的手动测试,然后对自动验证工具的发现进行了比较分析。样本网页上使用的自动验证工具由三个W3C验证工具组成。结果显示,三分之二的网站未通过优先级1验证,而100%的网站未通过优先级2和优先级3验证。此外,还根据508节指南对三个网页进行了测试。辅助技术进行手动测试的结果证实,这三个网站均未达到联邦政策的最低要求。此外,对W3C工具验证之间的比较分析表明,每个自动验证工具的发现之间存在显着差异。;本研究的结果表明,通过自动验证工具的评估不足以确保可访问的网站能够残疾人。重要的是,利用辅助工具来确定对残障人士来说似乎可访问的Web可访问性。提出了改进建议,例如鼓励大学为网站管理员提供培训,并强制使用屏幕阅读器作为验证工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alam, Najma H.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arkansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Arkansas.;
  • 学科 Web studies.;Educational technology.;Technical communication.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号