• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Diffusion of meta-analysis, systematic review, and related research synthesis methods: Patterns, contexts, and impact.
【24h】

Diffusion of meta-analysis, systematic review, and related research synthesis methods: Patterns, contexts, and impact.

机译：荟萃分析，系统评价和相关研究综合方法的扩散：模式，背景和影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Like collaboration and interdisciplinary scholarship, research synthesis methods are used to integrate science knowledge. Unlike collaboration and interdisciplinary scholarship, research synthesis is a scientific method researchers apply to systematically and explicitly integrate knowledge from primary research studies to estimate the best answer to a specific question based on accumulated research findings. This study investigates the diffusion and impact of research synthesis methods at the macro- and meso-levels. At the macro-level, diffusion from 1972-2011 is described using bibliometric methods. Relatively modest engagement with the methods in the 1970s and 1980s was followed by increased engagement across a greater diversity of fields in the 1990s. Engagement with the methods continued to increase and spread across fields through the first decade of the 2000s. Engagement with research synthesis methods was strongly correlated with engagement with evidence-based practice (rho = 0.893, p < 0.001) and the number of years a field engaged with the methods (rho = 0.706, p < 0.001), moderately correlated with engagement with past research (rho = 0.403, p < 0.001); and modestly correlated with Biglan class (rho = 0.279, p = 0.011). Five fields, Evolutionary Biology, Conservation Biology, Social Work, Women's Studies, and Information and Library Science were selected for investigation at the meso-level. Content analysis, topic modeling, and qualitative summaries of literature at the intersections of these fields and research synthesis contextualize the diffusion process and reveal differences and similarities across field contexts. Bibliometric evaluation indicates that adoption of research synthesis contributes to changes in collaboration patterns: a greater number of authors contribute to research syntheses than research reviews in fields where collaboration on research reviews is low. This study provides some evidence that use of the methods has refined rather than replaced roles of traditional research reviews in Social Work; and illustrates interactions between innovations and use contexts. Innovations and their contexts are modified through adaptations influenced by historical contexts, values, and goals that intersect with the innovation use context.
机译：像合作和跨学科奖学金一样，研究综合方法也用于整合科学知识。与合作和跨学科奖学金不同，研究综合是研究人员用于系统地，明确地整合来自基础研究的知识，以基于积累的研究结果来估计特定问题的最佳答案的一种科学方法。本研究在宏观和内观层面研究研究综合方法的扩散和影响。在宏观一级，使用文献计量法描述了1972-2011年的扩散。在1970年代和1980年代对方法的参与程度相对较低，随后在1990年代对更大范围的领域进行了更多的参与。在2000年代的前十年中，人们对方法的参与度不断提高，并遍及各个领域。与研究综合方法的参与与基于证据的实践的参与（rho = 0.893，p <0.001）以及与该方法从事领域的年数（rho = 0.706，p <0.001）高度相关，与与研究方法的参与程度密切相关过去的研究（rho = 0.403，p <0.001）;并且与Biglan类别适度相关（rho = 0.279，p = 0.011）。选择了五个领域，即进化生物学，保护生物学，社会工作，妇女研究以及信息和图书馆学，以进行中观水平的研究。在这些领域和研究综合的交汇处，内容分析，主题建模和文献的定性摘要将传播过程情境化，并揭示了跨领域情境的异同。文献计量评估表明，采用研究综合方法可促进协作模式的改变：与研究综述协作性较低的领域相比，研究综述的作者数量更多。这项研究提供了一些证据，表明使用这些方法已经完善而不是取代了传统研究评论在社会工作中的作用；并说明了创新与使用环境之间的相互作用。通过受历史背景，价值和与创新使用环境相交的目标影响的适应，可以修改创新及其环境。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sheble, Laura.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Information Science.;Sociology Theory and Methods.;Library Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 364 p.
  • 总页数 364
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号