• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Non-legal factors influencing judging in United States Courts of Appeal in higher education sex discrimination in employment cases.
【24h】

Non-legal factors influencing judging in United States Courts of Appeal in higher education sex discrimination in employment cases.

机译：在就业案例中，影响高等教育美国性别歧视的非法律因素会影响美国上诉法院的审判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite the general increase of women in the workforce, there has been an increase in sex discrimination law suits brought in the U. S. every year (Beiner, 2005). Plaintiffs alleging gender-based workplace discrimination use three principal grounds for their claims - the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C.A. § 2000 ), and Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C.A. § 1681-1863). T.;his study examines the important area of employment gender discrimination cases involving higher education institutions rendered in the United States Courts of Appeals between 1964 and 2013. Two separate databases were compiled for analysis, one which examined individual judges' votes and the other which examined case decisional outcomes.;For the individual voting data base, 693 judicial votes were analyzed with the purpose of examining the relationship between variables. Political ideology, judges' gender and appointment era, and gender of the plaintiff served as the independent variables. The dependent variable was the individual judges' votes with a pro-plaintiff vote treated as "liberal" and a pro-defendant one as "conservative".;For the case outcome measure, 231 cases from the U.S. Courts of Appeal were included in determining if composition of the three member panel influenced each case outcome. The independent variables included ideological majority of panel, gender majority of the panel, appointment era majority of the panel, and plaintiffs' gender. The dependent variable was the case decisional outcome, with pro-plaintiff decisions labeled as "liberal" votes, while pro-defendant decisions were categorized as "conservative".;Results revealed that appointment era and plaintiffs' gender were significant variables influencing judicial voting in both data bases. Implications of these findings show the influence of presidential appointments on the U.S. Courts of Appeal.
机译：尽管劳动力中女性人数普遍增加，但美国每年提起的性别歧视诉讼案件仍在增加（Beiner，2005年）。指控基于性别的工作场所歧视的原告使用三个主要依据提出申诉-美国宪法第十四修正案的平等保护条款，1964年《民权法》第VII篇（42 USCA§2000）和《美国宪法》第IX篇1972年教育修正案（20 USCA§1681-1863）。 T .;他的研究调查了1964年至2013年间在美国上诉法院提起的涉及高等教育机构的就业性别歧视案件的重要领域。两个独立的数据库进行了分析，一个数据库检查了个别法官的选票，另一个数据库检查了案件的判决结果。；对于个人投票数据库，分析了693个司法投票，目的是检查变量之间的关系。政治意识形态，法官的性别和任用时代以及原告的性别是自变量。因变量是个人法官的票数，赞成原告的票数视为“自由”，赞成原告的票数为“保守”。；对于案件结果衡量标准，美国上诉法院的231宗案件被包括在内。是否由三个成员组成的小组影响每个案件的结果。自变量包括：意识形态多数，小组性别多数，任命时代小组多数和原告性别。因变量是案件的判决结果，赞成原告的判决被标记为“自由”票，赞成原告的判决被归类为“保守”。结果表明，任命时代和原告的性别是影响司法投票的重要变量。这两个数据库。这些调查结果暗示了总统任命对美国上诉法院的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hutson, LeAnne Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Arlington.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Arlington.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.;Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 177 p.
  • 总页数 177
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号