• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perspectives of fishery management councils and stakeholders in the New England and Mid-Atlantic regions.
【24h】

Ecosystem-based fisheries management: Perspectives of fishery management councils and stakeholders in the New England and Mid-Atlantic regions.

机译：基于生态系统的渔业管理：新英格兰和中大西洋地区渔业管理委员会和利益相关者的观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of the dissertation research was to improve understanding of factors contributing to or preventing progress on ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) implementation for the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) and the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC), focusing on Council member and stakeholder beliefs, attitudes, and understanding. The Coorientation Model and the Planning Table were used to guide inquiry into the research objectives. The Coorientation Modelwas used to measure the degree of understanding between Council members and stakeholders. The concept of the Planning Table addressed whose interests were voiced, acknowledged, and incorporated into planning decisions. Council meetings were observed and 66 individuals were interviewed, including Council members, Council staff members, and Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) members in the New England (NE) and Mid-Atlantic (MA) regions, about EBFM. Additionally, more than 5,600 surveys were sent to commercial fishermen, recreational anglers, non-governmental organization leaders, SSC members and MAFMC and NEFMC members in the NE and MA regions about EBFM and over 1,000 responses were received. Neither low agreement nor low understanding between Council members and stakeholders appeared to be a barrier to NEFMC or MAFMC transition to EBFM. Council members and stakeholders responded that there are needs for social science information for EBFM and that although Council members and stakeholders perceive major barriers to EBFM, Council members and stakeholders do not perceive that these challenges are insurmountable. The study highlights specific barriers, social science needs, time lines and recommendations that MAFMC and NEFMC decision makers could focus on to facilitate the transition from single species fisheries management to EBFM. Specifically, decision makers and stakeholders recommend the development of a pilot plan for EBFM. Overall, managers and stakeholders in both the NE and MA regions generally agreed that EBFM is a holistic approach to fisheries management which includes biological, environmental, and human factors, and that the Councils should gradually transition to a management plan that reflects EBFM.
机译：论文研究的目的是增进对大西洋中部渔业管理委员会（MAFMC）和新英格兰渔业管理委员会（NEFMC）对基于生态系统的渔业管理（EBFM）实施的贡献或阻止进展的因素的理解。关于安理会成员和利益相关者的信念，态度和理解。协调模型和计划表用于指导对研究目标的询问。协调模型用于衡量理事会成员与利益相关者之间的理解程度。计划表的概念解决了谁表达了自己的利益，并确认了他们的利益并将其纳入计划决策中。观察了理事会会议，并就新的EBFM采访了66位个人，包括新英格兰（NE）和中大西洋（MA）地区的理事会成员，理事会工作人员以及科学和统计委员会（SSC）成员。此外，还向东北和马萨诸塞州的商业渔民，休闲垂钓者，非政府组织负责人，南南合作成员以及MAFMC和NEFMC成员发送了5,600多个有关EBFM的调查，并收到了1,000多个答复。安理会成员与利益相关者之间的共识不足或理解不足似乎都不是NEFMC或MAFMC向EBFM过渡的障碍。理事会成员和利益相关者回答说，EBFM需要社会科学信息，尽管理事会成员和利益相关者意识到EBFM的主要障碍，但理事会成员和利益相关者并不认为这些挑战是不可克服的。该研究突出了MAFMC和NEFMC决策者可以重点关注的特定障碍，社会科学需求，时间表和建议，以促进从单一物种渔业管理向EBFM的过渡。具体来说，决策者和利益相关者建议制定EBFM的试验计划。总体而言，东北和南亚地区的管理者和利益相关者普遍认为，EBFM是一种包括生物，环境和人为因素在内的渔业管理的整体方法，理事会应逐步过渡到反映EBFM的管理计划。

著录项

  • 作者

    Biedron, Ingrid.;

  • 作者单位

    Cornell University.;

  • 授予单位 Cornell University.;
  • 学科 Natural resource management.;Ecology.;Aquatic sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 336 p.
  • 总页数 336
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号