首页> 外文学位 >Testimonios of the U.S. Rural 'Homeless': A Critical and Decolonizing-Decolonized Ethnography
【24h】

Testimonios of the U.S. Rural 'Homeless': A Critical and Decolonizing-Decolonized Ethnography

机译:美国农村“无家可归者”的证言:批判性和非殖民化非殖民化的人种志

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Homelessness is a structural and political problem that is commonly pathologized in research and media, and criminalized through policies in the U.S. Rural homelessness has been rendered invisible, societally and discursively, compared to urban homelessness. This critical ethnographic study centers the testimonios of thirteen people who have experienced housing instability in Springfield, a U.S. rural town. Houseless people use their testimonios as a political tool to unframe and challenge the discursive construction of their identities. They also deconstruct the meaning of the American Dream and re-envision it by redefining success, parenthood, and the meaning of home. I use a decolonizing research methodology grounded in Chicana/Latina feminism and Indigenous epistemologies, to analyze the processes of identity construction of unhoused people. Critical researchers like O'Flaherty (Lee et al., 2010) and politicians like Ellison (NLIHC, 2017) argue that the U.S. government lacks the "political will" to do what is right and re-evaluate housing policies, the job market, and medical services. I argue there is not one way of being homeless. Unfortunately, the label "homeless" demarcates the houseless' body within a limited set of behaviors and characteristics, that negates the possibility of acknowledging that these individuals possess spiritual, cognitive, ontological, and emotional dimensions.
机译:无家可归是一个结构和政治问题,通常在研究和媒体中受到病理处理,并通过美国的政策被定为刑事犯罪。与城市无家可归相比,农村无家可归已变得无形,社会性和话语性。这项重要的人种学研究集中了美国乡村小镇斯普林菲尔德市十三名经历住房不稳定的人的证词。无家可归的人将其证词作为一种政治工具来解构并挑战其身份的话语结构。他们还通过重新定义成功,父母身份和家的含义来解构美国梦的含义,并重新构想它。我使用基于中国/拉丁裔女权主义和土著认识论的非殖民化研究方法,来分析无住所者的身份建构过程。像O'Flaherty(Lee et al。,2010)和Ellison(NLIHC,2017)这样的批评家认为,美国政府缺乏做正确的事并重新评估住房政策,就业市场,和医疗服务。我认为没有一种无家可归的方法。不幸的是,“无家可归者”这个标签将无家可归者的身体划分为一组有限的行为和特征,从而消除了承认这些人具有精神,认知,本体论和情感维度的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University.;

  • 授予单位 Washington State University.;
  • 学科 Cultural anthropology.;American studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 268 p.
  • 总页数 268
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号