首页> 外文学位 >Structural shifts in agricultural markets caused by government mandates: Ethanol and the Renewable Fuels Standard.
【24h】

Structural shifts in agricultural markets caused by government mandates: Ethanol and the Renewable Fuels Standard.

机译:由政府指令引起的农业市场结构性变化:乙醇和可再生燃料标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For many decades, demand for agricultural commodities has remained stagnant and its growth has been limited. In contrast, agricultural production continues to become ever more efficient by increasing output for stable or decreased inputs. Long-run profits have historically been near zero due to an ongoing relative equilibrium. But recent U.S. energy policy has changed to include a Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS), the goal of which is to boost domestic energy independence in an environmentally sound way. Most of the RFS in the near-term relies on the production of 15 billion gallons of ethanol made from corn. This has the effect of creating a new sector of demand for grain corn and subsequently supports rural economies.;Ethanol in the U.S. is primarily made from the starchy molecules in corn. One bushel of corn in a dry mill ethanol plant will produce approximately 2.7 gallons of ethanol and 17 pounds of dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) which can be used in livestock rations. A wet mill plant will produce other by-products. Ethanol can be used directly in the nation's fuel supply at limited levels of blending. Most cars in the United States can withstand the corrosive nature of ethanol in blends of up to 10% or more. But flex-fuel vehicles, which are able to operate on 85% ethanol are increasingly becoming available for sale and their use continues to grow.;Corn ethanol is a very complex issue when implemented on such a large scale as the RFS dictates. The amount of transportation fuel actually displaced by its use is a hotly debated topic. In any case, the large scale production of corn ethanol has created a firm link between agricultural markets and the energy sector. Ethanol is also an environmental issue. One of the primary goals of the RFS is to combat global warming and whether or not this is achieved it currently in debate. Aside from the climate change issue, there are other environmental ramifications tied directly to ethanol such as contamination, water use and land-use change.;Since the inception of the RFS, price volatility and uncertainty has never been greater. In the first half of 2008, prices for all commodities reached historically high levels. This raises the concern of the impacts with the RFS has on markets other than corn. The livestock industry and other grain markets have been affected to some degree by the RFS. This is in part due to the changing profile of the major trading participants in the commodity trading centers.;All of this is related to a structural change which has taken place in the agricultural markets as a result of the RFS. Historical relationships between price, supply and demand have adjusted and currently continue to adjust. The reasons for the adjustments are founded in economic theory regarding system-wide demand shocks. In this case, the demand shock is roughly a net 50% increase in the demand for corn by 2015 compared to the most recent decade. The adjustments which take place can be summarized by three periods. In period 1, the demand curve shifts outward, equilibrium is lost and higher corn prices are observed. In period 2, the market struggles to find a new equilibrium by increasing output. This period is marked by increased volatility and market participants over and under react to price signals until the new equilibrium is discovered. Period three is represented by the discovery of a relative market equilibrium at price higher than previously, but not as high as the initial demand shock.;Results from a fundamental analysis of the grain markets show that the expected market behavior has begun to take place and agriculture finds itself in period 2 of the changes described above. While most of the price changes and acreage shifts can be explained, the degree to which prices have increased are not fully explained. A change in trading center activities (Boards of Trade, etc.) may help to further account for the new prices. A survey of brokers shows that the behavior of commercial traders has significantly changed since RFS implementation. Volatility and uncertainty have ensued. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:几十年来,对农产品的需求一直停滞不前,其增长受到限制。相反,通过增加产量来稳定或减少投入,农业生产将继续变得越来越有效率。由于持续的相对均衡,长期利润在历史上一直接近于零。但是最近的美国能源政策已经改变为包括可再生燃料标准(RFS),其目标是以无害环境的方式促进国内能源独立性。短期内大多数RFS依赖于玉米制得的150亿加仑乙醇的生产。这产生了对谷物玉米的新需求部门并随后支持农村经济的效果。;美国的乙醇主要由玉米中的淀粉分子制成。在干磨乙醇工厂中,每蒲式耳玉米将产生约2.7加仑乙醇和17磅可溶干酒糟(DDGS),可用于家畜配给。湿磨厂将生产其他副产品。乙醇可以以有限的混合水平直接用于美国的燃料供应中。在美国,大多数汽车在混合比例高达10%或更高的乙醇中都能承受乙醇的腐蚀性。但是,能够在85%的乙醇上运行的弹性燃料汽车越来越多地可供销售,并且其使用量还在不断增长。当RFS要求如此大规模实施时,玉米乙醇是一个非常复杂的问题。因使用而实际替代的运输燃料量是一个备受争议的话题。无论如何,玉米乙醇的大规模生产已经在农业市场和能源部门之间建立了牢固的联系。乙醇也是一个环境问题。 RFS的主要目标之一是与全球变暖作斗争,以及是否能够实现这一目标目前正在辩论中。除了气候变化问题外,还有与乙醇直接相关的其他环境影响,例如污染,用水和土地利用变化。自RFS推出以来,价格的波动性和不确定性从未像现在这样大。在2008年上半年,所有商品的价格均达到历史最高水平。这引起了人们对RFS对玉米以外市场的影响的担忧。畜牧业和其他谷物市场在一定程度上受到了RFS的影响。这部分是由于商品交易中心主要贸易参与者的身份发生了变化。所有这些都与RFS导致农产品市场发生的结构性变化有关。价格,供需之间的历史关系已经调整,并且目前仍在继续调整。进行调整的原因是基于关于系统范围内需求冲击的经济学理论。在这种情况下,与最近十年相比,需求冲击到2015年玉米需求净增长约50%。进行的调整可以分为三个阶段。在第1阶段,需求曲线向外移动,失去了平衡,并观察到较高的玉米价格。在第二阶段,市场努力通过增加产量来寻找新的平衡。这个时期的特点是波动加剧,市场参与者对价格信号的反应过度或反应缓慢,直到发现新的平衡为止。第三阶段的特点是发现了一个相对市场均衡,其价格高于先前的价格,但没有最初的需求冲击那么高。对谷物市场进行基本分析的结果表明,预期的市场行为已经开始发生,并且农业处于上述变化的第二阶段。尽管可以解释大多数价格变化和种植面积变化,但价格上升的程度还不能完全解释。交易中心活动(交易委员会等)的变化可能有助于进一步解释新价格。对经纪人的一项调查显示,自RFS实施以来,商业交易者的行为已发生重大变化。随之而来的是波动性和不确定性。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Olson, John Christian.;

  • 作者单位

    Utah State University.;

  • 授予单位 Utah State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Agricultural.
  • 学位 M.B.A.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 136 p.
  • 总页数 136
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农业经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号