• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Measuring indirect benefits of brownfield redevelopment using the hedonic price method: The cases of Lansing, Michigan.
【24h】

Measuring indirect benefits of brownfield redevelopment using the hedonic price method: The cases of Lansing, Michigan.

机译：用享乐价格法衡量棕地重建的间接收益：以密歇根州兰辛市为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The main purpose of this study is to measure the indirect economic benefits of brownfield redevelopment by using the hedonic price method. The study analyzed impacts of brownfield redevelopment on the price of surrounding properties, using three brownfield redevelopment cases in Lansing, Michigan. The empirical findings of the hedonic price analysis confirmed the existing literature observing that the proximity to brownfield sites or environmental hazards was negatively related to the property values in nearby neighborhoods. The empirical findings of the analysis also supported the hypothesized relationship between the proximity to brownfield sites and nearby housing values before and after redevelopment. Redevelopment of brownfields was expected to provide positive impacts on the housing values in the surrounding neighborhood by eliminating or substantially reducing the negative externality associated with brownfields.;The analysis employed two different hedonic functional models to estimate the indirect benefits of three brownfield redevelopment projects: a linear functional model and a log-linear functional model. The results of the two analyses were consistent with each other, showing that the estimated total benefit of three redevelopment projects was ;As this study confirms, the cleanup or redevelopment of brownfields provides indirect benefits that cannot be measured easily in the current market system. However, this kind of indirect benefit of brownfield redevelopment has not been an important consideration in the public decision-making framework. Without acknowledgement of the full potential benefits and costs associated with brownfield redevelopment, it is not possible to make an efficient allocation of resources in the public policy area. The empirical findings of this study can be used to justify public financial assistance for the cleanup or redevelopment of brownfields. The findings can also help government officials prioritize competing projects to use public resources more efficiently. This study also suggests that the estimated hedonic function can be used to determine the benefits of brownfield cleanup or redevelopment in the decision-making process.;However, some limitations were inherent in this study due to the small number of redeveloped brownfield sites. First, its empirical findings cannot be generalized as the indirect economic benefits of brownfield redevelopment due to the small number of brownfield redevelopment cases. Second, even though the study compared the benefits of three brownfield redevelopment cases based on their different redevelopment scenarios, the comparison should not be generalized due to the limited number of brownfield redevelopment cases in the study. The limitations of the study suggest that future researchers might consider analyzing the indirect economic impacts of brownfield redevelopment using a large number of redeveloped brownfields in various geographical locations, and contrasting hedonic price methods to other more descriptive approaches to measuring the indirect economic benefit of brownfield redevelopment.
机译：这项研究的主要目的是通过享乐价格法来衡量棕地重建的间接经济利益。该研究利用密歇根州兰辛市的三个棕地再开发案例分析了棕地再开发对周边物业价格的影响。对享乐主义价格分析的经验发现证实了现有的文献，观察到靠近棕地或环境危害与附近社区的财产价值负相关。分析的经验发现也支持重建前后棕色地带的邻近性与附近房屋价值之间的假设关系。预计棕地的重建将通过消除或大幅减少与棕地相关的负面外部性，对周围社区的房屋价值产生积极影响。;该分析采用了两种不同的享乐功能模型来估算三个棕地重建项目的间接收益：线性功能模型和对数线性功能模型。两项分析的结果彼此吻合，表明三个重建项目的总收益为；正如本研究证实的那样，清理或改造棕地可提供在当前市场体系中不易衡量的间接收益。但是，棕地重建的这种间接利益在公共决策框架中并不是重要的考虑因素。如果不认识到与棕地重建相关的全部潜在利益和成本，就不可能在公共政策领域进行有效的资源分配。这项研究的经验性发现可以用来证明公共财政援助用于清理或重建棕地的合理性。调查结果还可以帮助政府官员确定竞争项目的优先级，以更有效地利用公共资源。这项研究还表明，估计的享乐功能可用于确定决策过程中棕地清理或重新开发的好处。但是，由于重新开发的棕地站点数量少，该研究固有的局限性。首先，由于棕地重建案例数量少，其经验发现不能被概括为棕地重建的间接经济利益。其次，即使该研究根据不同的重建场景比较了三个棕地再开发案例的收益，但由于该研究中的棕地再开发案例数量有限，因此不应将比较进行概括。该研究的局限性表明，未来的研究人员可能会考虑在不同地理位置使用大量已开发的棕地来分析棕地重建的间接经济影响，并将享乐主义价格方法与其他更具描述性的方法进行对比，以衡量棕地重建的间接经济利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号