• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Why is sexual harassment offensive? The effects of privacy regulation on sexual harassment perception.
【24h】

Why is sexual harassment offensive? The effects of privacy regulation on sexual harassment perception.

机译：为什么要进行性骚扰？隐私法规对性骚扰知觉的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite an extensive amount of legal cases and social science research on sexual harassment, there are still important questions that need to be answered. Many legal scholars and social scientists disagree about how it should be defined, why people perceive ambiguous, but potentially sexually harassing situations differently and why it is morally offensive. A review of the legal history of sexual harassment and social science research examining these questions is presented. It is suggested that sexual harassment is morally offensive because it violates an individual's right to privacy. A study was performed to provide support for this theory by testing the hypothesis that the ability to regulate privacy successfully affects the interpretations of ambiguous, but potentially sexually harassing behavior. Participants were divided into three privacy regulation groups (less than desired, as much as desired, and more than desired) on a discrepancy score measure for the privacy preferences of reserve and solitude. Participants' reactions to ambiguous, but potentially harassing situations that either interfered with control of personal information or infringed upon personal space were assessed. The hypothesis that females would perceive vignettes as more harassing was also tested. Results indicated that females perceived vignettes as more harassing than males and that the difference was even larger for the personal space intrusions than the personal information intrusions. Subsequent analyses indicated that for those who regulated solitude adequately, people who failed to obtain as much reserve as desired perceived the vignettes intruding on personal information as more harassing than those who regulated reserve adequately or obtained more reserve than desired. Also, effects were found supporting the hypothesis that privacy preference affects regulation and the interpretation of potentially harassing behaviors. One of the main implications of these results is that there could potentially be a hierarchy of privacy needs. People who fail to obtain their desired level of one privacy preference may not attenuate to invasions of other types of privacy. The results provide some limited support for the theory that sexual harassment is morally offensive because it violates privacy rights. Further study of privacy regulation and sexual harassment can provide future benefits for society.
机译：尽管有关性骚扰的法律案件和社会科学研究领域广泛，但仍有一些重要问题需要解答。许多法律学者和社会科学家对如何定义它，人们为何感到模棱两可，但潜在地对性骚扰情况有所不同以及为什么在道德上令人反感持不同意见。本文介绍了性骚扰的法律历史回顾以及研究这些问题的社会科学研究。建议性骚扰在道德上是令人反感的，因为它侵犯了个人的隐私权。进行了一项研究，通过检验以下假设来为该理论提供支持：调节隐私的能力成功影响了模棱两可但潜在的性骚扰行为的解释。参与者根据对保留和独处的隐私偏好的差异评分标准，分为三个隐私规章组（低于期望，期望，更多和高于期望）。评估了参与者对模棱两可，但可能会干扰个人信息控制或侵犯个人空间的骚扰情况的反应。还检验了女性会觉得骚扰更多的假说的假说。结果表明，女性对渐晕的感觉比男性更容易受到骚扰，并且个人空间入侵的差异甚至大于个人信息入侵。随后的分析表明，对于那些适当地调节了孤独性的人来说，未能获得所需的尽可能多的储备的人比那些充分地调节了储备的人或那些获得了超出期望的储备的人更容易感到侵犯个人信息的小插曲。此外，还发现了影响隐私偏好会影响监管和潜在骚扰行为解释的假说的效应。这些结果的主要含义之一是可能存在隐私需求的层次结构。无法获得其期望的一种隐私偏好水平的人可能不会减弱对其他类型隐私的入侵。结果为性骚扰在道德上令人反感，因为它侵犯了隐私权，在理论上提供了有限的支持。进一步研究隐私法规和性骚扰可以为社会带来未来的收益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Busath, Gregory Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    Brigham Young University.;

  • 授予单位 Brigham Young University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 140 p.
  • 总页数 140
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号