• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Stand-alone mitigation plans and recovery costs: A study of the Florida Local Mitigation Strategies.
【24h】

Stand-alone mitigation plans and recovery costs: A study of the Florida Local Mitigation Strategies.

机译：独立的缓解计划和恢复成本：佛罗里达州本地缓解策略的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Previous evaluation and research studies focused on planning have indicated that the incorporation of natural hazards into comprehensive plans results in a reduction in property loss following a disaster event (R. J. Burby et al., 1999, 2000; A. C. Nelson & S. P. French, 2002; R. B. Olshansky, 2001). To date, minimal research has been conducted on the efficacy of stand-alone mitigation plans to reduce disaster loss. With passage of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and its emphasis on mitigation planning, analysis of its efficacy in reducing disaster expenditures is important. The dearth of related research increases the relevancy of this study.;This current study sought to determine whether mitigation planning improves community disaster resiliency through the reduction of disaster recovery costs. The purpose of this research was to investigate whether vulnerable populations and property are protected from loss due to natural disasters by continued investment in mitigation planning under the present legislative framework. This research examines the Local Mitigation Strategies implemented within Florida and over 25 federally declared events from 1994 through 2004. The Local Mitigation Strategy served as the pilot program for the planning requirement introduced in the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. A multivariate model was applied to determine whether disaster expenditures or per capita expenditure from the natural disasters under study could have been reduced had a mitigation plan been in place. It was found that having a plan did not reduce either type of expenditure. Based upon these findings, changes are strongly recommended in the manner in which mitigation planning is conducted under the current framework to reduce the loss of life and property from natural disaster events.
机译：先前针对计划的评估和研究表明，将自然灾害纳入综合计划可减少灾难发生后财产损失（RJ Burby等人，1999，2000； AC Nelson＆SP French，2002； RB Olshansky，2001）。迄今为止，关于独立缓解计划减少灾难损失的功效的研究很少。随着2000年《减灾法案》的通过和对减灾计划的强调，分析其在减少灾难支出方面的功效非常重要。相关研究的缺乏增加了本研究的相关性。本研究旨在确定减灾计划是否通过降低灾难恢复成本来提高社区的抗灾能力。这项研究的目的是，通过在当前立法框架下继续投资于减灾规划，来调查脆弱人群和财产是否受到自然灾害的保护。这项研究调查了1994年至2004年在佛罗里达州实施的本地缓解策略以及25项联邦宣布的事件。本地缓解策略是2000年《灾难缓解法》引入的规划要求的试点计划。采用多变量模型来确定如果制定了缓解计划，是否可以减少正在研究的自然灾害造成的灾害支出或人均支出。发现制定计划并不能减少这两种支出。基于这些发现，强烈建议以当前框架下进行缓解计划的方式进行更改，以减少自然灾害事件造成的生命和财产损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号