首页> 外文学位 >Novel statistical approaches to assessing the risk of QT prolongation and sample size calculations in 'thorough QT/QTc studies'.
【24h】

Novel statistical approaches to assessing the risk of QT prolongation and sample size calculations in 'thorough QT/QTc studies'.

机译:评估“全面QT / QTc研究”中QT延长风险和样本量计算的新颖统计方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The ICH E14 guidelines mandate performing a 'thorough QT/QTc study' on any non-antiarrythmic drug, to assess its potential effect on cardiac repolarization, as detected by QT prolongation, before it can be approved and marketed. The standard way of analyzing a thorough QT (TQT) study to assess a drug for its potential for QT prolongation is to construct a 90% two-sided (or a 95% one-sided) confidence interval (CI), for the difference in baseline-corrected mean QTc (heart-rate corrected version of QT) between drug and placebo at each time point, and to conclude non-inferiority if the upper limit for each CI is less than 10 ms. The ICH E14 guidelines define a negative thorough QT study as one in which the upper 95% CI for the maximum time-matched mean effect of the drug as compared to placebo is less than 10 ms. A Monte Carlo simulation-based Bayesian approach is proposed to resolve this problem by constructing a posterior credible interval for the maximum difference parameter.;While an interval estimation-based approach may be a way to address the QT prolongation problem, it does not necessarily confirm to the actual intent of the ICH E14 guidelines, which is to establish that the mean effect of the drug is less than 5 ms. Also proposed is a novel Bayesian approach that attempts to directly calculate the probability that the mean effect is no larger than 5 ms, thereby, providing a direct measure of evidence of whether the drug prolongs mean QTc beyond the tolerable threshold of 5 ms. Performance of the proposed approaches has been assessed using simulated data, and illustrations of the methods have been provided through real data sets obtained from TQT studies conducted at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).;Both these proposed methods as well as the other methods for analyzing QTc data are based on multivariate normal models, with common covariance structure for both drug and placebo. Such modeling assumptions may be violated and when the sample sizes are small the statistical inference can be sensitive to such stringent assumptions. A flexible class of parametric models is proposed to address the above-mentioned limitations of the currently used models. A Bayesian methodology is used for data analysis, and model comparisons are performed using the deviance information criterion (DIC). Superior performance of the proposed models over the currently used models is illustrated through a real data set obtained from a GSK-conducted TQT study. Both the proposed methods for analyzing QT data can be extended to this flexible class of models.;Another major aspect of TQT studies is the sample size determination. Costs involved in conducting such studies are substantial and hence sample size calculations play a very important role in ensuring a small but adequate TQT study. A variety of methods have been proposed to perform sample size calculations under the frequentist paradigm. Such methods have a limited scope and usually apply in the context of linear mixed models, with some assumed covariance structure for the observations. A sample size determination method, using the proposed novel Bayesian method involving estimation of the probability of concluding a thorough QT study negative, is provided, which would ensure that the total error rate in the context of declaring a TQT study negative is restricted to a desired low level. This method does not rely on any restrictive covariance assumptions.
机译:ICH E14指南要求对任何非抗心律失常药物进行“全面的QT / QTc研究”,以评估其通过QT延长所检测出的对心脏复极的潜在影响,然后才能批准和上市。分析彻底QT(TQT)研究以评估药物可能延长QT的标准方法是,针对90%的差异建立一个90%的两侧(或95%的一侧)置信区间(CI)。在每个时间点,药物和安慰剂之间的基线校正平均QTc(QT的心率校正版本),如果每个CI的上限小于10 ms,则得出非劣效性结论。 ICH E14指南将彻底的QT研究定义为阴性,其中与安慰剂相比,最大时间匹配药物平均效应的95%CI小于10 ms。提出了一种基于蒙特卡洛模拟的贝叶斯方法来解决此问题,方法是为最大差值参数构造一个后置可信区间。尽管基于区间估计的方法可能是解决QT延长问题的一种方法,但不一定能确定符合ICH E14指南的实际意图,即确定该药物的平均作用小于5毫秒。还提出了一种新颖的贝叶斯方法,该方法试图直接计算平均效果不大于5 ms的概率,从而提供一种直接的证据,以证明该药物是否延长了平均QTc超过5 ms的容许阈值。已使用模拟数据评估了所提出方法的性能,并通过在葛兰素史克(GSK)进行的TQT研究获得的真实数据集提供了方法的说明。这两种方法以及其他分析QTc数据的方法基于多元正常模型,对于药物和安慰剂都有共同的协方差结构。可能会违反此类建模假设,并且当样本量较小时,统计推断可能会对此类严格假设敏感。提出了灵活的一类参数模型来解决当前使用的模型的上述限制。贝叶斯方法用于数据分析,并使用偏差信息标准(DIC)进行模型比较。通过从GSK进行的TQT研究获得的真实数据集,可以证明所提出模型的性能优于当前模型。两种提出的用于分析QT数据的方法都可以扩展到这种灵活的模型类别。TQT研究的另一个主要方面是样本量的确定。进行此类研究涉及的成本相当可观,因此样本量的计算对于确保进行少量但足够的TQT研究起着非常重要的作用。已经提出了多种方法来在常识范式下执行样本量计算。这种方法的范围有限,通常适用于线性混合模型,并带有一些假设的协方差结构用于观测。提供了使用建议的新颖贝叶斯方法的样本量确定方法,该方法涉及估计得出彻底QT研究阴性的可能性,这将确保在宣布TQT研究阴性的情况下将总错误率限制在所需的范围内低级。该方法不依赖于任何限制性协方差假设。

著录项

  • 作者

    Anand, Suraj P.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Biology Biostatistics.;Statistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 120 p.
  • 总页数 120
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生物数学方法;统计学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号