首页> 外文学位 >Biotechnology risks and benefits: Science instructor perspectives and practices.
【24h】

Biotechnology risks and benefits: Science instructor perspectives and practices.

机译:生物技术的风险和收益:科学教师的观点和实践。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Developing scientifically literate students who understand the socially contextualized nature of science and technology is a national focus of science education reform. Understanding teachers' views on this topic is of equal importance. This document focuses on the topic of risks and benefits posed by science and technology as an important topic for which the socially contextualized nature of science and technology readily emerges. Following introduction of a theoretical model and a review of the literature, two research studies are described that examined teachers' perceptions of the risks posed by biotechnology and the role of risk topics in an undergraduate science course.;The first research study examines four groups of science educators; pre-service science teachers, in-service science teachers, science graduate teaching assistants, and science professors (n = 91). The participants completed a survey and card sort task to determine their perceptions of the risks of biotechnology. The results show that teacher perceptions were shaped by the risk severity, regulation processes, public acceptance, fear, reciprocal benefits, and whether the applications would impact humans or the environment. Factors determining risk perception included personal worldviews, trust in communicating institutions, and personal experiences with biotechnology. The different types of science teachers were compared and contrasted in light of these factors and the implications of instructor perceptions on science pedagogy are discussed.;The second research manuscript describes a case study in which six biology graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) were observed teaching as lesson on the potential risks and benefits of biotechnology. The data sources included classroom observations and semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis reveals that GTAs framed the instruction of risk in one of three ways: analytical, focus on perspectives and biases, and promotion of individual reflection. Interview results suggest that GTAs had a much richer understanding of the importance of the teaching of social aspects of science and technology than emerged in their teaching. Results are discussed in the context of the disconnect between the GTA's teaching practice and perspectives.
机译:培养了解科学和技术的社会背景本质的具有科学素养的学生是科学教育改革的国家重点。了解教师对此主题的观点同样重要。本文档重点关注科学技术带来的风险和收益这一主题,因为科学和技术的社会背景本质很容易出现,这是一个重要的主题。在介绍了理论模型并回顾了文献之后,对两项研究进行了描述,这些研究研究了教师对生物技术带来的风险的理解以及风险主题在本科科学课程中的作用。科学教育工作者;职前科学教师,在职科学教师,科学研究生教学助理和科学教授(n = 91)。参与者完成了一项调查和卡片分类任务,以确定他们对生物技术风险的看法。结果表明,教师的看法受风险严重程度,监管程序,公众接受程度,恐惧,互惠利益以及应用程序是否会影响人类或环境的影响。决定风险感知的因素包括个人的世界观,对交流机构的信任以及对生物技术的个人经验。鉴于这些因素,对不同类型的理科教师进行了比较和对比,并讨论了教员的看法对科学教学法的影响。;第二篇研究论文描述了一个案例研究,其中观察到六个生物学研究生助教(GTA)关于生物技术潜在风险和收益的课程。数据来源包括课堂观察和半结构化访谈。定性分析表明,GTA通过以下三种方式之一来指导风险指示:分析,关注观点和偏见以及促进个人反思。访谈结果表明,与他们的教学相比,GTA对科学和技术社会方面的教学的重要性有了更丰富的理解。在GTA的教学实践和观点之间脱节的背景下讨论了结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gardner, Grant Ean.;

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Education Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 145 p.
  • 总页数 145
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学教育与普及;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号