• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >An empire of commerce, an empire of finance: The U.S. and the rise of neoliberal hegemony in the twentieth century.
【24h】

An empire of commerce, an empire of finance: The U.S. and the rise of neoliberal hegemony in the twentieth century.

机译：商业帝国，金融帝国：美国和20世纪新自由主义霸权的崛起。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The primary purpose of this thesis is the analysis of the rise and implementation of neoliberal economic policies within the United States from the late 1970's to the present. Consequently, this thesis undertakes an investigation of how private sector economic influences interact with and dominate the various domestic and foreign policy decisions of the United States throughout the course of the twentieth century. Implicitly this research process required a deeper analysis of how these policies (U.S. domestic and foreign policy) were motivated by private sector, capital accumulation strategies and thus, their subsequent influence over U.S. government policy, in general.;Thus, the basic definition of neoliberalism is predicated on the idea that government intervention in the marketplace should be confined to and operate on behalf of, private sector capital. In essence, neoliberalism asserts that government's primary responsibility is to stimulate private sector, entrepreneurial initiatives and create, facilitate and maintain various types of capital accumulation strategies, within the society at large. Other forms of acceptable intervention should also be confined to strengthening legal processes, which seek to protect and define property rights and the contractual obligations which surround these rights, maintaining the legitimacy of the national currency (the U.S. Dollar) and defending the rights of capital within both the U.S. domestic and international arenas. Alternatively, government promotion and maintenance of public welfare provisions are viewed as an inefficient and thus, unprofitable use of government's resources and responsibilities.;Unfortunately, as this thesis asserts, this "minimalist" definition of the state's obligations to its citizenry opens the proverbial door to elite, private sector capital and its various influences, counteracting the state's autonomy to create alternative strategies for its citizens which are not influenced, solely, by the needs of private sector capital. Accordingly, the nature of how neoliberalism was both articulated and implemented within the American state involves tracing both the role and the historical evolution of the American state over the twentieth century, to its relationship and interaction with organized capital.
机译：本文的主要目的是分析从1970年代末到现在的美国新自由主义经济政策的兴起和实施。因此，本文对私人经济影响如何在整个20世纪的过程中与美国的各种国内和外交政策相互作用以及如何支配美国进行了研究。暗中的研究过程需要更深入地分析这些政策（美国国内和外交政策）是如何受到私人部门，资本积累战略以及由此对美国政府政策的后续影响的激励。因此，新自由主义的基本定义假设政府干预市场应仅限于私营部门资本并代表私营部门资本运作。本质上，新自由主义断言政府的主要责任是在整个社会范围内刺激私营部门，企业家倡议并制定，促进和维持各种类型的资本积累策略。其他形式的可接受干预措施也应仅限于加强法律程序，这些程序旨在保护和定义财产权以及围绕这些权利的合同义务，保持本国货币（美元）的合法性，并捍卫资本权。美国国内和国际舞台上。或者，政府促进和维护公共福利条款被视为效率低下，因此对政府的资源和责任的利用是无利可图的。不幸的是，正如本论文所断言的那样，这种对国家对其公民义务的“最小化”定义打开了众所周知的大门对精英，私营部门资本及其各种影响的抵制，抵消了国家的自治权，为公民创造了另类的战略，而这些战略并不仅仅受到私营部门资本的需求的影响。因此，如何在美国国家内部阐明和实施新自由主义的本质涉及追溯美国国家在二十世纪的作用和历史演变，以及它与有组织资本的关系和相互作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pugia, Ross D.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Economics History.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 668 p.
  • 总页数 668
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号