• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Rating the sustainability of transportation investments: Corridors as a case study.
【24h】

Rating the sustainability of transportation investments: Corridors as a case study.

机译：评估运输投资的可持续性：以走廊为案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of a green rating system is to be able to apply sustainable concepts to the real world and to be able to quantify each credit for project certification. Therefore, each credit must be able to be measured in the field through individual requirements. For each credit, a set of requirements, or measurements, have been developed and used to determine whether the project has or has not achieved the credit. If the credit is achieved, then the associated points are granted to that project and then summed to determine the total credit points.;In order to assign points to the credits, a participatory phase surveyed transportation planning stakeholders to obtain a pairwise comparison of the credits. Inputs on the relative significance of each credit were gathered in order to rank the credits based on priority. The participatory phase used a decision making model, the Analytic Hierarchy Process, to allocate points and evaluate prerequisites for the program. Two approaches are used to allocate points to the credits: the Weighted Approach, a systematic method, and the Approximate Approach, a more user-friendly option.;A case study application assesses the applicability of SCRS in the field. The case study site is a segment on U.S. Route 40 in Delaware. Each credit within SCRS is evaluated using both point allocation approaches. The results of the case study are compared in terms of their effectiveness, ease of use, repeatability, and relevance.;SCRS is a tool that can be applied to corridor development and redevelopment. In addition, the methodology defined in this research can be applied universally to the development of green rating systems, similar to SCRS.
机译：绿色评级系统的目的是能够将可持续概念应用于现实世界，并能够量化项目认证的每个信用。因此，每个信用必须能够通过单独的要求在现场进行衡量。对于每个信用，已经开发了一组要求或度量，并用于确定项目是否已获得信用。如果获得了积分，则将相关积分授予该项目，然后求和以确定总积分。为了将积分分配给积分，参与阶段对运输计划利益相关者进行了调查，以获得积分的成对比较。收集了关于每个学分的相对重要性的输入，以便根据优先级对学分进行排名。参与阶段使用决策模型“层次分析法”来分配分数并评估程序的先决条件。两种方法可用于为学分分配分数：加权方法（一种系统方法）和近似方法（一种更加用户友好的选项）。案例研究应用程序评估了SCRS在该领域的适用性。案例研究网站位于美国特拉华州40号公路上。 SCRS中的每个信用都使用两种积分分配方法进行评估。比较了案例研究的结果的有效性，易用性，可重复性和相关性。SCRS是可用于走廊开发和重建的工具。此外，类似于SCRS，本研究中定义的方法可以普遍应用于绿色评级系统的开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号