• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The legitimacy of literature: Metaliterary reflection in Hermann Broch's 'The Death of Virgil' and Peter Weiss's 'The Aesthetics of Resistance'.
【24h】

The legitimacy of literature: Metaliterary reflection in Hermann Broch's 'The Death of Virgil' and Peter Weiss's 'The Aesthetics of Resistance'.

机译：文学的合法性：赫尔曼·布洛克（Hermann Broch）的《维吉尔之死》和彼得·魏斯（Peter Weiss）的《反抗美学》中的元文学反思。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation examines how Hermann Broch and Peter Weiss treat the question of the legitimacy of literature. It presents an analysis of metaliterary reflections---contemplations on literature conveyed through literature---in Broch's Der Tod des Vergil (The Death of Virgil) (1945) and Weiss's Die Asthetik des Widerstands (The Aesthetics of Resistance) (1975--1981) and examines theoretical and personal positions articulated in these authors' non-fiction works, notes and correspondence.;The question of the legitimacy of literature occupied writers such as Paul Celan, Ingeborg Bachmann und Wolfgang Hildesheimer, who concluded that the legitimacy question functions as much as a foundation for literature in the twentieth century as it simultaneously challenges it. The question of whether literature is a legitimate expressive form must be carried in literature and expressed as literature. This is what Der Tod des Vergil and Die Asthetik des Widerstands offer: a literary investigation into the question as to literature's own legitimacy. In both works, the autonomous nature of art---its freedom from all constraints imposed from outside the mechanisms of its own existence---is played out against the expectation of its participation in human reality while at the same time being shown to complement it.;Broch and Weiss saw in literature a means to access fundamental knowledge about reality. What Weiss characterizes as a 'revealing,' or rational learning process through which one can recognize inherently inhumane power structures (acquiring the means with which to counter them), takes place in Broch's conception as a metaphysical breakthrough into new spheres of knowledge. Here, the acquisition of knowledge is a transcendent experience, an overcoming of death [via "Todeserkenntnis"] and the symbolic realization of the eternal.;Despite momentary (Weiss) or longer-lasting (Broch) bouts of doubt as to whether writing literature might be considered a worthwhile, legitimate pursuit, both authors wrote literature until the end of their lives. Their distinct humanity and their drive to aid mankind in inhuman times allowed them no other possibility than to search for the humane and to nurture it where they found it most highly concentrated; this was and remained for them literature.
机译：本文探讨了赫尔曼·布罗奇和彼得·魏斯如何对待文学的合法性问题。它提供了对元文学反思的分析-通过文学传达的对文学的沉思-在Broch的Der Tod des Vergil（维吉尔之死）（1945）和Weiss的Die Asthetik des Widerstands（抵抗美学）（1975- 1981年），并研究了这些作者的非小说作品，笔记和书信中表达的理论和个人立场。它同时挑战了20世纪文学的基础。文学是否是合法的表达形式的问题必须在文学中承载并表达为文学。这就是《德·维吉尔报》和《宽广的世界观》所提供的：对文学自身合法性问题的文学研究。在这两件作品中，艺术的自主性-不受其自身存在机制的所有限制-都表现出它不参与人类现实的期望，同时又表现出互补性布鲁克和魏斯在文学中看到了一种获取有关现实的基础知识的方法。魏斯将其描述为“揭示”或理性学习过程，通过这种过程，人们可以认识到内在的非人道力量结构（寻求与之抗衡的手段），这发生在布罗奇的概念中，是向新的知识领域的形而上学突破。在这里，知识的获得是一种超凡的经历，是对死亡的克服（通过“ Todeserkenntnis”）和对永恒的象征性实现。尽管短暂（Weiss）或持久（Broch），对于是否写作文学都存有疑问。两位作者可能都被认为是值得的，合法的追求，直到他们生命的尽头才写文学。他们独特的人性和在非人类时代援助人类的动力使他们除了寻找人性并在他们发现人类最集中的地方进行培育之外别无其他可能性。对于他们而言，这一直是文学。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jenkins, Jennifer Lynne.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 210 p.
  • 总页数 210
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号