• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A study of Ju Zheng: Legal ideas and judicial practices 1932--1948.
【24h】

A study of Ju Zheng: Legal ideas and judicial practices 1932--1948.

机译：聚正研究：法律思想与司法实践，1932--1948年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

For more than sixteen years (1932-1948) Mr. Ju Zheng was the most influential figure of the national judiciary under the Nanjing Regime, making the case of his legal thoughts and practices highly illustrative of the legal history of modern China. Building on Mr. Ju's personal background and experiences, this thesis attempts to foster a better understanding of Ju Zheng and his era in terms of legal history.This thesis consists of five chapters: The first chapter introduces the scope of inquiry, the main themes of the study, the sources and the literature on this subject. Next chapter documents Ju Zheng's efforts in tackling the problems of Supreme Court inherited from his predecessors during his first three years in the key position of the judiciary. The third Chapter deals with the process of party control over the judiciary. In hindsight, this process went through two stages: first, it was a project to revolutionize the justices which ended up making most judges party members the atmosphere of the next stage manifested in an article of Ju Zheng which called attentions to efficacious partisan indoctrinations and to ground nationalism as the guideline for the justices. This process of intermingling of the judiciary and the party did generate some positive results. For instance, it created a vigorous nation-wide movement to seek abolition of the unequal treaties with foreign powers, which later on undergirded the judicial pattern of deciding amnesty cases by Ju Zheng judiciary. Chapter four explores the legal nationalization movements initiated from the National Conference of Justices in the year of 1935, vividly epitomized in the following nation-wide discussions in 1930s and 1940s on how to create a new legal system embedded in China context. The discussions eventually converged to two distinct lines: the first line claimed that it was the long-lasting Chinese culture (zhong guo gu you) that was to become the starting-point for a new legal system in contrast, the second line argued for "rebuilding" (chong xin jian li ) a new legal system for the modern China. The last chapter offers a few concluding remarks.Ever since the judicial reform in late Qing, all aspects linking to China law reforms were forced to be aligned with the national goal of abolishing the unequal treaties between China and foreign powers. Forty years' legal history, as the epochal era in shaping the modern Chinese legal system, became an integral part of history of the national movement against unequal treaties. Within the period where Ju Zheng was dominant in the sphere of law, the judiciary under party control and the nation-wide discussions on China new legal system were two successive processes of the national movement: the former was meant to create solidarity and political space needed for the anti-unequal-treaties movement, and the latter was measured to offer cultural continuity and identity consensus essential for national autonomy en course toward modernity. What's more, nationalism became the overarching ideology in legal sphere during Ju's times, and its repercussions helped foment a solid legal nationalization movement. This movement was embodied in organizations at the national level, namely the National Conference of Justices and the National Association in Jurisprudence of Republic of China. Second, the movement has two essential features: Party control over the judiciary and building of a new Chinese legal system. In this legal nationalization movement, Ju Zheng was the central figure and leader from the beginning right through the end.
机译：十六年来（1932-1948年），鞠铮先生是南京政权下国家司法机构中最有影响力的人物，这使他的法律思想和实践成为现代中国法律史的例证。本文以鞠先生的个人背景和经验为基础，力图在法律史上加深对鞠铮及其时代的理解。本文共分五章：第一章介绍探究的范围，主要主题。有关该主题的研究，资料和文献。下一章记录了朱铮在司法部门关键职位上任​​职头三年中为解决其前任继承的最高法院问题所作的努力。第三章论述了当事人对司法机关的控制过程。事后看来，这个过程经历了两个阶段：首先，这是一个改革司法的项目，最终使大多数法官党员都拥有下一阶段的气氛，这一点体现在鞠铮的一篇文章中，呼吁注意有效的党派灌输和将民族主义作为正义的准则。司法和政党融合的过程确实产生了一些积极的结果。例如，它发起了一场全国性的运动，力图废除与外国势力不平等的条约，此举后来削弱了菊正司法机构判决大赦案件的司法模式。第四章探讨了1935年美国全国司法会议发起的法律国有化运动，生动地概括了以下1930年代和1940年代关于如何建立嵌入中国的新法律体系的全国性讨论。讨论最终融合为两条截然不同的路线：第一行声称，正是持久的中国文化（中古谷油）才成为新法律制度的起点，第二行则主张“重建”（chong xin jian li），这是近代中国的新法律制度。最后一章是总结。自清末司法改革以来，与中国法律改革有关的各个方面都被迫与废除中外不平等条约的国家目标保持一致。作为塑造现代中国法律制度的时代时代，四十年的法律史已成为反对不平等条约的民族运动历史的组成部分。在鞠铮在法律领域占主导地位的时期内，受政党控制的司法机构和关于中国新法律制度的全国性讨论是民族运动的两个连续过程：前者旨在创造团结和所需的政治空间反对反不平等条约运动，而后者旨在提供文化连续性和认同共识，这是民族自治在走向现代的过程中必不可少的。更重要的是，民族主义在菊时代成为法律领域的首要意识形态，它的影响有助于煽动坚实的法律民族化运动。这一运动体现在国家一级的组织中，即中华民国司法会议和中华民族法学全国协会。其次，该运动具有两个基本特征：党对司法机关的控制和建立新的中国法律制度。在这场法律国有化运动中，鞠铮自始至终一直是中央人物和领导人。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jiang, Zhaoxin.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.History Modern.Political Science General.Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 189 p.
  • 总页数 189
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号