首页> 外文学位 >An empirical examination of the relationship between posttraumatic growth and the personality traits of hardiness, sense of coherence, locus of control, self-efficacy, resilience, and optimism.
【24h】

An empirical examination of the relationship between posttraumatic growth and the personality traits of hardiness, sense of coherence, locus of control, self-efficacy, resilience, and optimism.

机译:对创伤后成长与人格特质之间的关系进行实证检验,该人格特质的坚韧性,连贯感,控制源,自我效能感,韧性和乐观情绪。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the construct validity of Tedeschi and Calhoun's (2004) theory of posttraumatic growth, as measured by the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996), by empirically examining the nature of its relationship with hardiness, sense of coherence, resilience, self-efficacy, locus of control, and optimism. Data from 276 students and community members were collected through a web-based survey. Findings from a correlational and exploratory factor analysis did not support the theoretical link that Tedeschi and Calhoun purported would exist between posttraumatic growth and the six personality variables. Tedeschi and Calhoun's proposed 5 domain model of growth was also examined through a confirmatory factor analysis. Results and suggested modifications did not indicate an adequate level of fit for the model to this sample (chi2=457.33( p .0001), RMSEA = .09, CFI = .87, NFI = .81, GFI = .80). Exploratory analysis also failed to reveal a significant difference in total PTGI scores between individuals who did and did not report experiencing a traumatic event. Clinical implications for utilizing posttraumatic growth, as measured by the PTGI, could not be explored due to a lack of construct validity found in the study. In order to further explore the construct validity of posttraumatic growth, as measured by the PTGI, possible future areas of research are examined, including the underlying factor structure of the PTGI and further exploration of the nature of the relationship between posttraumatic growth and theoretically related personality variables.
机译:这项研究通过实证研究了特德斯基和卡尔霍恩(2004年)的创伤后增长库存量(PTGI; Tedeschi&Calhoun,1996),考察了特德斯基和卡尔霍恩(Tedeschi and Calhoun)的创伤后增长理论的建构效度。韧性,自我效能感,控制源和乐观情绪。通过基于网络的调查收集了276名学生和社区成员的数据。相关性和探索性因素分析的发现不支持Tedeschi和Calhoun所称的理论联系在创伤后成长和六个人格变量之间存在。通过验证性因素分析,还检验了Tedeschi和Calhoun提出的5域增长模型。结果和建议的修改均未表明该模型适合该样本的水平(chi2 = 457.33(p <.0001),RMSEA = .09,CFI = .87,NFI = .81,GFI = .80)。探索性分析也未能揭示出在没有和没有经历过创伤事件的个体之间,PTGI总得分之间的显着差异。由于缺乏在研究中发现的构建体有效性,因此无法探讨通过PTGI测量的利用创伤后生长的临床意义。为了进一步探索创伤后增长的建构效度(如PTGI所衡量),研究了可能的未来研究领域,包括PTGI的潜在因素结构,并进一步探索了创伤后增长与理论上相关的人格之间关系的性质变量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bossick, Brian E.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Akron.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Akron.;
  • 学科 Psychology Personality.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 173 p.
  • 总页数 173
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号