本文首先着力分析了英美法系下“所有权”的含义，通过与传统大陆民法体系下的所有权比较，辨析了两大法系下所有权并非是同一层面的概念，不能以传统民法财产权体系去分析双重所有权。然后以英美财产法的视角，通过考察信托起源和分析英美财产法的特质，解释了两大法系下所有权之所以不同的缘由。最后简略分析了两大法系财产法追求的功能应当是相似的，进而提出以功能面向看待大陆法系国家引入信托制度的意义，发挥出信托在不同维度上创设分割自由灵活的财产权的制度优势。%The concept of ownership of trust property is different under the two major legal systems . Therefore ,analyzing the dual ownership under the traditional civil law system is improper . In the perspective of property law ,investigating the origin of trust and analyzing characteristics of the property under Anglo‐American law system may ,to some extent ,explain the difference of concept of ownership under the two major legal systems .While the purpose of the two law systems might be similar ,civil law countries should take full advantage of trust’s ability of creating flexible property rights and introduce trust systems from a functional standpoint .
展开▼
