Since the second half of 2017 ,local administrations have carried out the study of the market-benchmark price of mining rights grant proceeds .Overall ,the principle of smooth transition ,organic connectivity and regional coordination is basically adhered to .However ,there are differences in classification and definition .At present ,there are some problems setting the benchmark price ,such as imbalance , insufficiency and uniformity .Therefore ,the benchmark price must be determined on the basis of clarifying the relationship with the benchmark price of fees for mining exploration and exploitation rights ,the evaluation of mining rights grant proceeds ,the benchmark rate of mining rights grant proceeds , distinguishing the method of mining rights grant ,the type of mining rights and the exploration stage ,taking into account the resource grade ,the location condition ,the use and other factors .At the same time ,in order to standardize the market-benchmark price ,it is proposed to formulate the evaluation guidelines and strengthen the dynamic monitoring of mineral market .%自2017年下半年以来,各地纷纷组织开展了矿业权出让收益市场基准价研究.总体来看,各地基本坚持平稳过度、有机衔接、区域协调等原则,然而,在类型划分、定义内涵等方面存在差异.现阶段,在基准价制定过程中,存在不平衡、不充分、不统一等问题.因此,市场基准价必须在厘清与矿业权价款基准价、矿业权出让收益评估价、矿业权出让收益基准率关系的基础上,区分矿业权出让方式、矿业权类型和勘查阶段,并考虑资源品位、区位条件、用途等因素确定.同时,为规范基准价,建议制定核定指南,加强矿产品市场动态监测.
展开▼
