By using the method of literature review and video analysis ,this paper analyzes the 16‐points‐later tactics of LIN Dan and LEE Chong Wei’s fierce games in recent 4 years .The results show that in16‐points‐later stage ,the active scoring ability of LIN Dan is stronger than the LEE ,LIN net scoring methods have the characteristics of diversification ,push ,short and pick the ball technique play an important role in the final stages of the game .The initiative drop failures of LIN Dan is relatively more ,and LEE net score means relatively single ,the low net score is direct reason of LEE’s loses ,LIN Dan scored during multiple shoot stage (11 ~20 ) significantly higher than LEE .%运用文献资料研究、录像分析等方法对林丹和李宗伟近4年焦灼比赛的16分后阶段进行技、战术统计分析，结果表明，16分后阶段，林丹的主动得分能力明显强于李宗伟；林丹网前得分手段具有多样化特点，推扑、短放和挑球技术得分在比赛的最后阶段起到重要作用；林丹吊球主动失误相对较多；李宗伟网前得分手段相对单一，网前球得分低是李宗伟多次输球的直接原因；林丹在多拍阶段（11～20拍）得分明显高于李宗伟。
展开▼
