To investigate the clinical effect of Hydrosun TM system in the treatment of chronic prostatitis (IIIB).Methods:62 prostatitis patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 3 1 patients in each group.The patients in observation group were treated with HydrosunTM system,while those in control group were treated with biofeedback.Pain symptoms score (CPSI-P),voiding symptom score (CPSI-U)and prostate symptom score (CPSI-T)before and after treatment were compared in the two groups as well as the effect of treatment.Results:The scores of CPSI-P,CPSI-U,CPSI-T in the two groups had no significant difference before treatment (P>0.05).The scores of CPSI-P,CPSI-U,CPSI-T were significantly lower than that before treatment in the two groups (P<0.05).The degree of decreasing with the scores of CPSI-P,CPSI-U,CPSI-T in observation group was higher than that in the control group after treatment (P<0.05);the total ef-fective rate of treatment in observation group was 87.10%,while the control group was 64.52%.There was signifi-cant difference between two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion:The HydrosunTMsystem has better curative effect on the treatment of chronic prostatitis IIIB.%目的：探讨HydrosunTM系统对IIIB型慢性前列腺炎的疗效。方法：将62例前列腺炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组，各31例；观察组采用HydrosunTM系统进行治疗，对照组采用生物反馈进行治疗；比较两组患者治疗前后疼痛症状评分（CPSI-P）、排尿症状评分（CPSI-U）、前列腺症状总分（CPSI-T），以及治疗效果。结果：治疗前两组患者的CPSI-P、CPSI-U、CPSI-T组间比较无显著差异（P＞0.05）。两组治疗后CPSI-P、CPSI-U、CPSI-T评分降低，与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组治疗后的CPSI-P、CPSI -U、CPSI -T下降幅度明显高于对照组（P ＜0.05）；观察组患者治疗的总有效率为87.10％，对照组总有效率为64.52％，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：HydrosunTM系统对II-IB型慢性前列腺炎治疗有较好的疗效。
展开▼
