首页> 中文期刊> 《中国医学影像技术》 >18F-FDG符合线路显像与99mTc-MDP骨显像及二者联合对乳腺癌骨转移的检出效能

18F-FDG符合线路显像与99mTc-MDP骨显像及二者联合对乳腺癌骨转移的检出效能

         

摘要

目的 采用ROC曲线比较18F-FDG符合线路显像、99mTc-MDP骨显像及二者联合对乳腺癌骨转移的检出效能.方法 收集手术病理诊断为乳腺癌的女性患者113例,均于4周内先后接受18F-FDG符合线路显像及99mTc-MDP骨显像;对两种显像结果按5分法评分,以二者评分之和为联合评分值,以病理诊断或临床随访为确诊“金标准”,比较ROC曲线下面积(AUC),评价99mTc-MDP骨显像、18F-FDG符合线路显像及联合评分法对乳腺癌骨转移患者的检出效能,比较不同方法在各自最佳诊断阈值下的灵敏度、特异度、准确率、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV).结果 113例中,12例(10.62%)最终确诊为骨转移,101例(89.38%)无骨转移.99mTc-MDP骨显像、18 F-FDG符合线路显像以及二者联合诊断评分的ROC曲线分析显示三者AUC分别为0.991、0.874和0.993,三种方法对乳腺癌骨转移的诊断效能均佳,尤以99mTc-MDP骨显像与联合诊断为最佳(P均<0.01).最佳阈值点下,单独18F-FDG符合线路显像、99mTc-MDP骨显像及联合检出骨转移患者的灵敏度分别为75.00%(9/12)、75.00%(9/12)、83.33%(10/12),特异度为100%(101/101)、98.02%(99/101)、98.02%(99/101),准确率为97.35%(110/113)、95.58%(108/113)、96.46%(109/113),PPV为100%(9/9)、81.82%(9/11)、83.33%(10/12),NPV为97.12%(101/104)、97.06%(99/102)、98.02%(99/101).结论 99mTc-MDP骨显像对乳腺癌骨转移患者的检出效能优于18F-FDG符合线路显像,二者联合可提高对骨转移患者的检出率.%Objective To observe the efficacy of 18F-FDG SPECT coincidence (18F-FDG SPECT) , 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy (BS) and combination of the two techniques (18F-FDG SPECT+99mTc-MDP BS) for detecting bone metastasis from breast cancer by ROC curve analysis. Methods Totally 113 patients with breast cancer underwent both 99mTc-MDP BS and 18F-FDG SPECT within 4 weeks. The images were interpreted according to 5-point scale, and the scale of 18F-FDG SPECT+99mTc-MDP BS was the sum of 18F-FDG SPECT plus 99mTc-MDP BS. The final diagnosis of bone metastases was established by pathology or follow-up, and then ROC curve analysis was performed. The area under the curve (AUC) , the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rate, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of cut-off point were compared. Results Of 113 cases, 12 (12/113, 10. 62%) were finally confirmed as bone metastases, while 101 (101/ 113, 89. 38%) were negative. The AUC was 0. 991 for 99mTc-MDP BS, 0. 874 for 18F-FDG SPECT, and 0. 993 for 18F-FDG SPECT+99mTc-MDP BS, respectively. AUC of 99mTc-MDP BS and18F-FDG SPECT + 99mTc-MDP BS were significantly larger than that of 18F-FDG SPECT (all P<0. 01). The optimal sensitivity of 18F-FDG SPECT, 99mTc-MDP BS and 18F-FDGSPECT+99mTc-MDP BS was75. 00% (9/12), 75.00% (9/12) and 83. 33% (10/12), respectively, the specificity was 100% (101/101), 98.02% (99/101) and 98.02% (99/101), respectively , the accuracy rate was 97. 35% (110/ 113), 95.58% (108/113) and 96. 46% (109/113), respectively , while PPV was 100% (9/9), 81.82% (9/11), 83.33% (10/12) and NPV was 97. 12% (101/104) , 97. 06% (99/102) and 98. 02% (99/101) , respectively. Conclusion The efficacy of 99mTc-MDP BS for detecting malignant bone metastasis was superior to that of 18F-FDG SPECT alone. The detection ability can be obviously improved by combination of these two techniques.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号