首页> 中文期刊> 《中国药理学与毒理学杂志》 >Mouse strain differences in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors sensitivity correlates with serotonin transporter binding and function

Mouse strain differences in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors sensitivity correlates with serotonin transporter binding and function

         

摘要

OBJECTIVE Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(SSRIs) bind 5-HT transporters,leading to the accumulation of 5-HT and amelioration of depression.Although different mouse strain showed different sensitivity to SSRIs in mouse models of depression,the reason for these strain differences remains unclear.Here,therefore,in the present study,we examined immobility time and locomotor activity in two mouse strains,namely,C57BL/6 J and DBA/2 J mice,and the effects of the SSRIs fluoxetine.Furthermore,we analyzed 5-HT transporter binding and reuptake inhibition in both strains to explore their relationship with the immobility and locomotor activity effects of the three SSRIs in these two mouse strains.METHODS Strain differences in SSRI effects in the tail suspension test(TST) and forced swimming test(FST).To initiate our studies,we sought to confirm that SERT strain variation did not alter SERT protein expression,5-HT recognition,or uptake activity when expressed in C57BL/6 J and DBA/2 J mice.Radioligand binding assays were conducted to determine the affinity of the SSRIs for the 5-HT transporters in the two mouse strains.RESULTS SSRI citalopram dose-dependently reduced immobility time in both the FST and TST in DBA/2 J but not C57BL/6 J mouse strains,whereas fluoxetine showed opposite results.Paroxetine reduced immobility time similarly in both strains.The affinity of citalopram for the 5-HT transporter in DBA/2 J mice was 700-fold higher than that for in C57BL/6 J mice,whereas the affinity of fluoxetine in C57BL/6 J mice was 100-fold higher than that in the DBA/2 J mouse.Furthermore,High citalopram concentrations were required to [3 H]5-HT uptake in C57BL/6 J but not DBA/2 J mouse cortical synaptosomes,whereas fluoxetine also showed opposite results.CONCLUSION Immobility duration depends on 5-HT transporter binding levels,leading to apparent strain differences in immobility time in FST and TST.Furthermore,differences in 5-HT transporter binding may cause variations in SSRI responses on behaviors.SERT mutation mice maintained sensitivity to paroxetine,an antidepressant that is unaffected by the mouse mutation.Therefore,the background strain of these mice likely contributes to the acute behavioral actions of SSRIs in immobility time.These differences may help to explain some of the discrepancies in studies that used these strains of mice to examine the role of 5-HT in mouse models of depression.Future studies should investigate additional neural substrates and molecular mechanisms underlying strain variations in mouse models of depression to help identify genetic predispositions to this disorder in humans.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号