首页> 外文期刊>中国医学科学杂志(英文版) >Gonioscopy and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in the Detection of Angle Closure in Patients with Shallow Anterior Chamber
【24h】

Gonioscopy and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in the Detection of Angle Closure in Patients with Shallow Anterior Chamber

机译:角膜镜检查和超声生物显微镜在浅前房患者闭角检测中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective To assess the agreement between gonioscopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in detecting angle closure in Chinese patients with shallow anterior chamber. Methods An observational comparative study of the two different examination methods was conducted. Patients with normal intraocular pressure and temporal peripheral anterior chamber depth less than a quarter of corneal thickness based on slit lamp examination were included in this study from December 2007 to May 2009 in the outpatient clinic of First Hospital of Tsinghua University. Gonioscopy was performed with a Goldman goniolens in dark room first and followed by full beam light and indentation. If the filtering trabecular meshwork was invisible or any peripheral anterior synechia was found, that quadrant of the angle was considered closed. UBM was first undertaken in a darkened room then repeated with normal room lighting. If iridotrabecular apposition was showed, that quadrant of the angle was considered closed. The status of angle closure of each quadrant with different methods was recorded. Results 85 eyes of 46 patients were included in this study. The agreement between gonioscopy and UBM was poor (κ<0.4) with Kappa analysis in both dark and light conditions in each quadrant. The accordance of agreement between gonioscopy and UBM was hardly affected by age or sex, while in dark condition, eyes with deeper anterior chamber (P=0.005) or plateau iris configuration tended to produce different results (P=0.075) in the 2 methods. Conclusion Gonioscopy and UBM are both indispensable methods for detecting angle closure, neither can completely replace the other.
机译:目的探讨角膜镜检查与超声生物显微镜(UBM)在中国浅前房患者闭角检测中的一致性。 方法进行了两种不同检查方法的观察性比较研究。根据裂隙灯检查,眼压正常且颞周围前房深度小于角膜厚度的四分之一的患者于2007年12月至2009年5月在清华大学第一医院的门诊就诊。首先在暗室中用戈德曼角镜进行眼底镜检查,然后用全光束和压痕进行。如果滤过的小梁网不可见或发现任何周围前粘连,则认为该象限是闭合的。首先,UBM在黑暗的房间中进行,然后在正常的房间照明下重复进行。如果显示虹膜小梁并置,则该角度的象限被认为是闭合的。记录使用不同方法的每个象限的角度闭合状态。 结果本研究纳入46例患者的85眼。 Kappa分析表明,在每个象限的黑暗和明亮条件下,角膜镜检查和UBM之间的一致性都很差(κ<0.4)。角膜镜检查和UBM之间的一致性几乎不受年龄或性别的影响,而在黑暗条件下,这两种方法中具有较深前房(P = 0.005)或高原虹膜形态的眼睛往往会产生不同的结果(P = 0.075)。 结论角膜镜检查和UBM都是检测角度闭合的必不可少的方法,两者都不能完全替代。

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国医学科学杂志(英文版)》 |2014年第4期|204-207|共4页
  • 作者单位

    Department of 0phthalmology, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China;

    Department of 0phthalmology, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China;

    Department of 0phthalmology, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China;

    Department of 0phthalmology, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China;

    Department of 0phthalmology, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China;

    Department of 0phthalmology, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China;

  • 收录信息 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD);中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号