After the Tort Law has been officially implemented, the public doubts that, it will be a sharp weapon for protecting people's rights or solving ＂gridlock＂ of the people's rights? In view of this, taking into account some cases in recent years, the article tackles the problem of ＂compulsory intervention rights＂ to readdress the wrong interpretation related to the law. Through the clinical theoretical analysis of ＂compulsory intervention right ＂, we also discuss the authorizations of emergent compulsory intervention rights in existing health laws and regulations, and bring forward new suggestions to relevant department's actions after the affairs.%正式实施后,其能否成为维护百姓权益的"利器"?能否解开百姓的维权"困局"?公众对此充满疑问.鉴于此,本文结合近年发生的实际案例,从"强制干预权"问题入手,纠正学界对本法有关条文的错误理解,通过对临床"强制干预权"的学理进行分析,解析现行卫生法律规制中紧急强制干预权的授权规定,并对事件发生后有关部门的作为提出建议.
展开▼
