在现行《著作权法》框架下，表演者和录音制作者对播放录音制品不享有权利，故第44条“播放录音制品法定许可”仅涉及作品，从而可以被第43条“播放作品法定许可”涵盖；第44条“当事人另有约定除外”的规定造成播放法定许可中对录制作品的保护高于普通作品；第44条授权国务院仅就播放录制作品制定付酬办法，造成播放普通作品付酬问题无法可依。应取消第44条规定，对播放录制作品统一适用播放作品法定许可，由此《广播电台电视台播放录音制品付酬暂行办法》因失去制定依据和适用对象应予废除，同时应授权国务院制定统一的《播放作品付酬办法》。%Performers and producers of phonograms have no right to broadcasting phonograms within the framework of current Chinese copyright law, therefore the article 44 concerning “statutory license of broadcasting phonograms” involves only works, and can be covered by article 43 regarding “statutory license of works”. The stipulation of "unless otherwise agreed by the parties" in article 44 results in higher protection for recorded works than for general works. Article 44 empowers the State Council to make rules only on how to pay for recorded works, leaving the broadcasting of general works beyond legal protection. It is therefore recommended to rescind article 44, and apply statutory license uniformly to broadcasting both recorded works and general works. Consequently, the Interim Procedures on the Payment of Broadcasting Phonograms by Broadcasting Stations and TV Stations should be repealed due to the lacking of basis for enactment and applicable object; meanwhile the State Council should be authorized to formulate the Procedures of Payment for Broadcasting Works.
展开▼
