• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 中文期刊> 《国际肝胆胰疾病杂志（英文版）》 >Outcomes of adult patients adopting small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes of adult patients adopting small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

         
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background:Small-for-size graft (SFSG) has emerged as one of the very contentions in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as a certain graft size is related to recipients’ prognosis. Graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) ≥0.8% was considered as a threshold to conduct LDLT. However, this also has been challenged over decades as a result of technique refinements. For a better understanding of SFSG in practice, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes between patients adopting the grafts with a lower volume (GRWR < 0.8%, SFSG group) and sufficient volume (GRWR ≥ 0.8%, non-SFSG group) in adult-to-adult LDLT. Data sources:The studies comparing recipients adopting graft with a GRWR < 0.8% and ≥ 0.8% were searched by three authors independently in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases until September 2018 and data were analyzed by RevMan 5.3.5. Results:Sixteen studies with a total of 3272 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), no significant difference was found in subjects enrolled after year 2010 (before 2010, OR = 3.00, 95% CI:1.69–5.35, P = 0.0 0 02; after 2010, OR = 1.23, 95% CI:0.79–1.90, P = 0.36;P for interaction:0.02). There was no significant difference in operative duration, blood loss, cold is-chemia time, biliary complications, acute rejection, postoperative bleeding, hospitalization time, periop-erative mortality, and 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates between two groups. Conclusions:This meta-analysis suggested that adopting SFSG in adult LDLT has comparable outcomes to those with non-SFSG counterparts since 2010.

著录项

  • 来源
    《国际肝胆胰疾病杂志（英文版）》 |2019年第3期|206-213|共8页
  • 作者

    Yue Yan; Dao-Feng Zheng; Jun-Liang Pu; Zhong-Jun Wu;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery;

    The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University;

    Chongqing 400016;

    China;

    Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery;

    The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University;

    Chongqing 400016;

    China;

    Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery;

    The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University;

    Chongqing 400016;

    China;

    Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery;

    The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University;

    Chongqing 400016;

    China;

  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号