首页> 外文期刊>矿业科学技术学报:英文版 >Comparative study of mining methods for reserves beneath end slope in flat surface mines with ultra-thick coal seams
【24h】

Comparative study of mining methods for reserves beneath end slope in flat surface mines with ultra-thick coal seams

机译:特厚煤层平面矿井底坡下储量开采方法的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper aims to identify a reasonable method for mining ultra-thick coal seams in an end-slope in surface mine. With a case study of Heidaigou surface coal mine (HSCM), the paper conducted a comparative research on three mining methods, namely Underground Mining Method (UMM), Highwall Mining System (HMS) and Local Steep Slope Mining Method (LSSMM). A model was firstly established to simulate the impact that UMM and HMS exert on monitoring points and surface deformation. The way that stripping and excavation amount varies with different slope angle, and the corresponding end slope stability were analyzed in the mode of LSSMM. Then a TOPSIS model was established by taking into account six indicators such as recovery ratio, technical complexity and adaptability, the impact on surface mining production, production safety and economic benefits. Finally, LSSMM was determined as the best mining method for mining ultra-thick coal seams in end slope in HSCM.
机译:本文旨在确定一种合理的露天煤矿端坡超厚煤层开采方法。本文以黑岱沟露天煤矿为例,对地下采矿法,高墙开采系统和局部陡坡开采法三种开采方法进行了比较研究。首先建立了一个模型来模拟UMM和HMS对监测点和表面变形的影响。在LSSMM模式下,分析了不同倾斜角度下剥离和开挖量的变化方式,以及相应的端坡稳定性。然后,结合回收率,技术复杂性和适应性,对露天采矿生产的影响,生产安全和经济效益等六个指标建立了TOPSIS模型。最后,LSSMM被确定为HSCM端坡超厚煤层开采的最佳方法。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号