[目的]推进苹果省力化生产,了解低成本塑膜袋套袋对苹果果实品质的影响.[方法]应用田间试验的方法,以红富士为试材,研究不同品牌塑膜袋套袋对富士苹果果实品质的影响.[结果]着色指数和光洁度指数以塑膜袋处理低于双层纸袋处理,而高于不套袋,其中着色指数以常丰处理最高,其次是新惠阳处理,再次是惠强处理;光洁度指数以新惠阳处理最高,其次是惠强处理,再次是绿果林处理;色度以代表红色的a*值以果冉处理最高,其次是新惠阳处理,再次是绿果林处理;单果重以塑膜袋处理最高,不套袋处理居中,双层纸袋处理最低,其中塑膜袋以绿果林处理最高,其次是常丰,再次是晨阳;去皮硬度以果冉处理最高,其次是常丰处理,再次是晨阳处理;可溶性固形物含量以不套袋最高,塑膜袋和双层纸袋处理差别不大,塑膜袋以绿果林处理最高,其次是新惠阳处理,再次是果冉处理;糖酸比(口感)也以绿果林处理最高,其次是新惠阳处理,再次是常丰处理.[结论]塑膜袋以新惠阳处理效果最佳,其次是绿果林和常丰处理.%[Objective]To promote the development of the apple saving labor production, meanwhile,understand the effect of low cost bagging with different brand plastic bags on fruit quality of Fuji apple .[ Method] The effect of bagging with different brand plastic bags on fruit quality of Fuji apple was studied by using the method of field experiment.[Result] The smoothness index and coloring index of apples with plastic bags were better than without bag, and worse than paper bag.Coloring index of apples with the Changfeng brand bag was the highest , followed by the Lüguolin and Huiqiang bags.The smoothness index with the Xinhuiyang bag was lowest , followed by the Huiqiang and Lüguolin bags.In the inner qualities, single fruit weight of the apple was the biggest with plastic bags, followed by the unbagged, the last was the paper bag, meanwhile, a-mong these plastic bags, it was the highest with the Lüguolin bag, followed by the Changfeng and Chenyang bags.About the fruit hardness, the highest was the apple with Guoran bag, followed by the Changfeng and Chenyang bags.The soluble solids content of the unbagged apple was high-er, the plastic bag and paper bag had no significant differences.Among the plastic bags, the soluble solids content of the apple with Lüguolin bag was the highest, followed by the Xinhuiyang and Guoran bags.The sugar acid of apple was the highest with Lüguolin bag,followed by the Xinhuiy-ang and Changfeng bags.[Conclusion]Xinhuiyang bag has the best effect,followed by Lüguolin bag and Changfeng bag.
展开▼
