首页> 中文期刊> 《安徽农业科学》 >香格里拉高山松天然更新评价分析

香格里拉高山松天然更新评价分析

         

摘要

[Objective] The aim was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of four regeneration types of P. Densata in Shangri-la, which were fire-slash regeneration, cutover land regeneration, gap regeneration and undergrowth regeneration. [Method] Three indexes, such as the number of plants per unit area, annual average increment of plant height, annual average increment of ground diameter were selected, and factors analysis was used to carry out overall merit. [ Result] It exhibited in nicer sequence, namely fire-slash regeneration, cutover land regeneration, gap regeneration and undergrowth regeneration. It was true of fact that fire-slash regeneration and cutover land regeneration had chiefly used in workaround, and the results were coincide with actual production. [Conclusion] Factors analysis was used to carry out overall merit, which not only could take into account of plant number per unit area and growth vigour of regeneration plants, but also could avoid the divergence in component index score analysis, thus, the results had certain guiding effect on actual production.%[目的]评价香格里拉高山松火烧迹地更新、采伐迹地更新、林隙更新、林下更新4种立地更新类型的优劣状况,[方法]选用单位面积株数、苗木长势的苗高年平均生长量,地径年平均生长量3个指标,采用因子分析法进行综合评价.[结果]火烧迹地更新效果最好,其次是采伐迹地更新、林隙更新、林下更新.调查区实际生产中也主要采用火烧迹地和采伐迹地更新方式,结果与实际生产相符.[结论]采用因子分析法进行综合指标评价,既能兼顾单位面积株树和更新苗木长势,同时也避免了分量指标评价分析中出现的分歧,故该方法所得结果对生产实际具有一定的指导作用.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号