China’s eurrent law prohibits a party eontaeted separately the judge privately,but in praetiee jud-ges,in many eases breaking the prohibitions established norms. From the perspeetive of value judgments eonsidera-tions. Judges and the parties normative eommunieation behavior does not endanger the eurrent judieial dispute reso-lution funetion,but from the program statutory standpoint,the damage to the legitimaey of the judieial proeess is an objeetive reality. The eurrent prevalenee no regulate eommunieation behavior,whieh produees mainly three reasons:First,the judge evaluation system is unreasonable,the seeond the judge existenee an entity impartial,whieh pursu-ing the eolleetive uneonseious,the three are part of the distriet eourt eases too mueh emphasis on mediation rate. Aehieving the basie path of eommunieation behaviors are threefold:First,improving the relevant laws and regula-tions,and seeond,to aehieve tune trial separation,the third is to strengthen the administration of justiee.%我国现行法律禁止法官私自单独接触一方当事人，但实务中法官在案件审理过程中与当事人多有接触，很多情况下都突破了既有规范的禁止性规定。从价值判断的角度考量，法官与当事人沟通行为的不规范性并没有危及当下的司法纠纷解决功能，但从程序法定的角度看，其对司法程序正当性的损害是客观存在的。当下普遍存在的法官与当事人不规范沟通行为，其产生的主要原因有法官考评制度不合理、法官存在追求实体公正的集体无意识以及部分地方法院过分注重案件调解率。要实现法官与当事人沟通行为的正当化，就必须完善相关法律规范，实现调审分离，加强司法行政管理。
展开▼
