上博《诗论》发布和研究，推动了《毛诗序》研究。文章认为，《诗论》发现对深化《毛诗序》研究具有启发性。通过考察四个《毛诗》的关键性版本，再结合文献中相关记载，确实透露出了《毛诗序》作者、作期的信息：首先，《毛诗故训传》本为一体之作，《毛诗故训传》本来就包含有《序》和《传》两部分；其次，今所见最早单疏本《毛诗正义》，对考察了解汉代《毛诗》版本样式，提供了重要实物参考；第三，《毛诗正义》发布后，推动了《毛诗》传播，必须重视李善所代表的唐初普遍认可的关于《毛诗序》《毛传》作者的意见。另外，文章还澄清《毛诗序》研究中的认识问题。%The On Poetry issued by Shanghai Museum and its research put forward the study of the Preface to Mao Poetry that brought some enlightenment to the deeper research of it. Through the study of the key editions of the Mao Poetry and the related records of its documents, the information of the writer and the date of writing of Preface to Mao Poetry were certainly revealed. At first, the edition of The Legend of Ancient Doctrines of Mao Poetry originally contains Preface and Legend. Then, the earliest edition of Maoshi Zhengyi we see today offered important object reference to study the style of the edition of Mao Poetry in Han Dynasty. The third, the release of Maoshi Zhengyi promoted the diffusion Mao Poetry; therefore we should attach importance to the view, which was widely accepted in the early Tang Dynasty with Li Shan as its representative, on the writer of the Preface to Mao Poetry and the The Legend of Mao Poetry. In addition, the ideological problems about the study on Preface to Mao Poetry will be clarified in this paper.
展开▼
