首页> 中文期刊> 《现代肿瘤医学》 >超声引导粗针活检及触诊下细针活检对颈部肿块的诊断对比观察

超声引导粗针活检及触诊下细针活检对颈部肿块的诊断对比观察

         

摘要

目的:探讨超声引导粗针活检(14G-18G)与触诊下普通细针穿刺抽吸活检(20-22G)对颈部肿块诊断的价值.方法:124例颈部肿块患者中68例行超声引导下粗针穿刺活检,另56例行触诊下细针穿刺抽吸活检,将二者的诊断结果进行对比.所取组织能作出明确的细胞学或(和)组织学病理诊断者为取材满意,否则为不满意.结果:粗针活检68例,平均进针2.4次/例,满意率98.5%;细针56例,每例进针1次,满意率64.3%.结论:超声引导下粗针活检同细针穿刺抽吸活检一样安全,且所取标本较大、完整,有利于病理科处理和组织学分型,值得在临床推广应用.%Objective:To discuss the clinically diagnostic value of cutting needle biopsy and fine - needle aspiration cytology on neck masses.Methods :To compare the pathologic results of 68 cases of US - guided cutting needle biopsy and 56 cases of fine -needle aspiration cytology on neck masses, cytological and/or histological diagnostic verification was regarded as satisfactory results, inconclusive case was recognized as dissatisfactory.Results: Satisfactory rate of CNB was 98.5 % with about 2.4 tissue cores for each patient while the satisfactory rate of FNA was 64.3% with 1 tissue core for each patient.Conclusion:Cutting needle biopsy is as safe as fine - needle aspiration cytology on neck mass but it has more clinical value due to more intact tissue sample for pathologic diagnosis.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号