首页> 中文期刊> 《南昌大学学报(医学版)》 >小切口非超声乳化手术与超声乳化治疗白内障的对比研究

小切口非超声乳化手术与超声乳化治疗白内障的对比研究

         

摘要

目的:探讨小切口非超声乳化手术在白内障治疗中的应用价值。方法将80例白内障患者按照治疗方法的不同分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。对照组采用超声乳化白内障摘除术治疗,观察组采用小切口非超声乳化手术治疗,比较2组患者的治疗效果、并发症发生情况及治疗费用。结果2组术后视力>0.5的比率均显著高于术前(P <0.05);对照组术后1 d 视力>0.5的比率显著高于观察组(P <0.05);术后1周、1个月时,2组视力>0.5的比率比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。2组患者术后并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05),观察组的治疗费用显著少于对照组(P <0.05)。结论小切口非超声乳化治疗白内障的疗效较好,且费用低、操作简便、易于推广,适合在广大基层医院开展。%Objective To explore the value of small incision non-phacoemulsification surgery in the treatment of cataract.Methods Eighty patients with cataract were assigned to receive either phacoemulsification cataract extraction (control group,n=40)or small incision non-phacoemulsi-fication surgery (observation group,n=40).The efficacy,incidence of complications and cost of treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The percentage of patients with visu-al acuity>0.5 significantly increased after treatment in both groups (P <0.05).Furthermore,the percentage of patients with visual acuity>0.5 in control group was significantly higher than that in observation group 1 day after treatment (P <0.05).There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with visual acuity>0.5 between the two groups 1 week and 1 month after operation (P >0.05).Moreover,there was no significant difference in the incidence of complica-tions between the two groups after operation (P >0.05).However,the cost of treatment in ob-servation group was significantly less than that in control group(P <0.05).Conclusion Small in-cision non-phacoemulsification surgery is effective,simple and economical for treating cataract. Therefore,this method is suitable for promotion in grassroots hospitals.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号