This article reviews the controversy in China over the relationship of the productivity and the magnitude of value,and explores the key points of the disagreement in each period of the controversy. Early debates focused on the simultaneous relationship of the productivity and the magnitude of value between the economic agents in the same period.It changed onto the temporal relationship of the pro-ductivity and the magnitude of value between different periods of the same agent,with development of the approach of “the labor amount in labor time”.The essential disagreement in early debates was which one possesses the priority between the individual value and the social value.The approach of“the labor amount in labor time”brought about the difference on the measurement of the amount of la-bor.There are two major differences at the present time.One is the relationship between the proposi-tion that the magnitude of value is direct proportion to the productivity and the proposition of inverse proportion.The other is how to perceive the economic growth from the point of view of labor theory of value.%梳理国内学界就劳动生产率与价值量关系的争论的演变历程，以及争论各阶段的主要分歧，我们可以看到：早期的争论集中于同一时期不同主体间生产率与价值量的共时性关系；随着“劳动时间中包含的劳动量”这一论证思路的建立，争论逐渐转向同一主体在不同时期中生产率与价值量的历时性关系。早期争论的主要分歧在于个别价值与社会价值的逻辑先在性；“劳动时间中包含的劳动量”的论证思路引出了有关劳动量的衡量尺度的分歧。在争论发生转向之后，分歧主要表现在两个方面：其一，成正比和成反比的关系是什么；其二，如何以劳动价值论为基础认识社会经济增长。
展开▼
