Information Philosophy claimed that the "indirect and unreal"information body (the moon in the water)and the "direct and real" material body(the moon in the sky)are the "ontologies" which are "quite distinctive in the way of existence"and can be found in the"objective information(self‐presence infor‐mation)"whose evolutionary process has followed the natural courses from self‐creation ,self‐regulation up to self‐evolution and thus obtained the objective primacy .However ,this case study doesn't explain why the photon image of the moon in the water and in the sky (objective information or self‐presence information) can replace the ontologies of the substances like the moon or flower to realize the self‐organizing informa‐tion evolution in the unreal and indirect information field (mediation particle field ) .So ,this paper believed that "the information evolutionism"cannot replace Marxist "material evolutionism".%“信息哲学”发现“间接存在、不实在”的“信息体（水中月）”与“直接存在、实在”的“物质体（天上月）”是“存在方式具有本质区别”的“本体”，从而首创为所谓“客观信息（自在信息）”找到了“本体”。宣称所有“客观信息（自在信息）”都具有“自身造就自身、自身规定自身、自身演化自身，从而展开其自身纯自然起源、运动、发展的历程”，由此获得了客观第一性的地位。可是，该理论案例不能说明在“不实在、间接存在”的“信息场（中介粒子场）”里，“水中月、镜中花”之光子影像（客观信息、自在信息），为什么能够替代“月亮、花朵”等物质本体实现“自组织的信息进化”。所以，“信息进化论”根本不能用来替代马哲的“物质进化论”。
展开▼
