通过考察上古与鼻音结合的复辅音的拟音问题发现：1）从“耳”、“矛”等谐声偏旁的谐声关系可得出《说文解字》谐声具有层级关系；从“尒”声的谐声系列比较复杂，有些异读字可能是音变造成的；“玺”是会意字，许慎所说的“从土尔声”的说解是汉字讹变造成的假象；日母和明母的谐声关系不是复辅音的反映，用谐声构拟复辅音要结合古文字学、通假关系并理顺谐声字的层级关系；2）从“矛”的本义和通假关系得出“柔”是“矛”的分化字，两者没有谐声关系，有些明母和日母的谐声可能是方言的影响；3）从谐声的系统性来说，拟鼻冠音的证据还不充足。%After analyzing the reconstruction of archaic Chinese consonant clusters involving na-sals,this paper presents the following findings:1)There is a hierarchical relationship in the “xiesh-eng”(谐声)system in “Shuowen Jiezi”regarding the phonetic components of “er”(耳),“mao”(矛), among others.The characters taking the phonetic component “er”(尒)are relatively more complex. Some homographs may be caused by sound change.The character “xi”(玺)is an associative com-pound.The treatment of “tu”(土)as the radical and “er”(爾)as the phonetic component by Xu Shen is erroneous.The phonetic association between the initials “ming”(明)and “ri”(日)do not re-flect consonant clusters.The reconstruction of consonant clusters with phono-semantic compounds must employ the studies of paleography,inferred meanings from sounds and scientific analysis of the hierarchical levels of phono-semantic compounds.2)From the original meaning and its usage as a phonetic loan character,it is certain that “rou”is derived from “mao”and that they do not have the relationship of “xiesheng”.Some “xiesheng”relationships between “ming”and “ri”result from dia-lectal influence.3)From the systematic nature of the “xiesheng”relation,the reconstruction of pre-nasal consonants still lacks sufficient evidence.
展开▼
