首页> 外文期刊>世界急诊医学杂志(英文版) >How to secure the connection between thoracostomy tube and drainage system?
【24h】

How to secure the connection between thoracostomy tube and drainage system?

机译:如何确保胸腔造口管和引流系统之间的连接?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Thoracostomy tube insertion is one of the common bedside procedures in emergency medicine and many acute specialties. Dislodgement of thoracostomy tube from the connection tube of chest drainage system is an important problem with potential complications such as contamination, infection and pneumothorax. Besides, mere loosening can also lead to malfunction. It is a common practice to tape the connection of the system. This study aimed to evaluate the materials and methods of connection of chest drain system to minimize drainage dislodgement. METHODS: We conducted an experimental study to assess the tightness of the connection with various taping materials and methods. We selected three commonly used adhesive materials(3Mtm Transporetm Medical tape, 3Mtm Microporetm Medical tape, 3Mtm Soft Cloth Tape on Liner) and three different methods(cross method, straight method, nylon band) to secure the junction between the thoracostomy tube and the bi-conical adaptor in the drainage system. The measured outcome was the weight causing visible loosening of the junction between thoracotomy tube and the adaptor.RESULTS: For each taping material and taping method, 10 trials were performed. The median weight required to disconnect the junction is 26.22 lb for Transporetm, 31.29 lb for Microporetm and 32.44 lb for Soft Cloth Tape on Liner. A smaller force was required to disconnect if Transporetm is used(P<0.001). There was no statistical signifi cant difference between Microporetm and Soft Cloth Tape on Liner(P=0.98). The median disconnecting force is 32.44 lb for straight taping method, 40.55 lb for cross taping method and 21.15 lb for plastic band. The cross-taping method was the more secure method(P<0.0001 when compared with plastic band)(P=0.033 when compared with straight method).CONCLUSION: Cross-taping is the most secure method among the tested varieties in connecting the thoracostomy tube to the chest drainage system. Transporetm is not a recommended material for thoracostomy tube taping.
机译:背景:胸腔镜置管术是急诊医学和许多急性专科中常见的床旁手术之一。从胸腔引流系统的连接管上移开胸造口管是一个潜在的重要问题,可能会引起并发症,例如污染,感染和气胸。此外,仅松动也可能导致故障。磁带连接系统是一种常见的做法。这项研究旨在评估连接胸腔引流系统的材料和方法,以最大程度地减少引流。方法:我们进行了一项实验研究,以评估与各种胶带材料和方法的连接的紧密度。我们选择了三种常用的粘合材料(3Mtm Transporetm医用胶带,3Mtm Microporetm医用胶带,3Mtm衬垫上的软布胶带)和三种不同的方法(交叉方法,笔直方法,尼龙带)来固定胸腔造口管和胆管之间的连接处。 -排水系统中的锥形适配器。测量的结果是重量,导致开胸管和适配器之间的连接处明显松动。结果:对于每种包带材料和包带方法,均进行了10次试验。对于Transporetm,断开连接所需的中位重量为26.22 lb,对于Microporetm为31.29 lb,对于衬板软布胶带为32.44lb。如果使用Transporetm,则需要较小的力来断开连接(P <0.001)。衬板上的微孔与软布胶带之间无统计学差异(P = 0.98)。直型编带方法的中位断开力为32.44 lb,交叉编带方法的中位断开力为40.55 lb,塑料带为21.15lb。交叉绑扎方法是更安全的方法(与塑料绑带相比,P <0.0001)(与直接绑扎方法相比,P = 0.033)。结论:交叉绑扎法是被测品种在连接胸廓造口管中最安全的方法到胸腔引流系统。不推荐将Transporetm用于胸腔穿刺术的管子包扎材料。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号